Digital Public Service Communication and the Performance of Indonesia’s OSS Licensing System: Evidence from Pangkep Regency

Ridha Amaliyah, Selmaian Salam, Moehammad Iqbal Sultan, Alem Febri Sonni

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of digital public service communication in supporting the performance of Online Single Submission (OSS) licensing services in Pangkep Regency, Indonesia. It addresses key challenges of digital governance in developing countries, particularly those related to public understanding, user participation, and service effectiveness. A qualitative approach was employed, combining a case study design with a phenomenological perspective to explore organizational practices and user experiences in depth. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with OSS officers and licensing applicants, participatory observation of the service process, and analysis of OSS guidance documents and internal procedures. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns and relationships between communication practices and service performance. The findings show that although the Pangkep Regency Investment and One-Stop Integrated Service Office (DPMPTSP) uses various digital channels, including official websites, social media, OSS applications, and call centers, the quality and clarity of information remain inconsistent. Technical and formalistic content creates barriers for applicants with low digital literacy. Internal coordination among administrative units also affects service consistency and speed, as unclear or inconsistent information increases procedural errors and delays in permit issuance. Effective communication strategies, such as visual guides, video tutorials, infographics, and regular coordination meetings, were found to be important factors in improving service efficiency and applicant participation. This study emphasizes that the success of digital governance depends not only on technological infrastructure but also on the quality of public communication and internal coordination. The findings contribute to the digital governance literature and provide practical recommendations for improving OSS implementation at the local government level.

 

Keywords: digital governance; public service communication; Online Single Submission; OSS licensing system; organizational coordination; user participation; local government; Indonesia.

 

DOI https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.53.5.8


Full Text:

PDF


References


R. Wardana et al., “Good Governance di Era Digital : Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang Sebagai Model Transformasi Pelayanan Publik,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 66–80, 2025, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.33701/jtkp.v7i1.5094.

Ayu, I. Rachmawati, and T. Nur, “Efektivitas Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Aplikasi Layanan Moci Legit Di Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Sukabumi,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 411–420, 2023, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.37676/professional.v10i2.4368.

B. Hirsch, F. S. Aleksander, P. Kovač, and D. Ravšelj, “The impact of Digitalized Communication on the effectiveness of Local Administrative Authorities – Findings from Central European Countries in the COVID-19 Crisis,” pp. 173–192, 2023, doi: https://link.springer.com/journal/11573.

A. Iskandar and K. Kawalu, “Public Service Innovation in the Smart Governance Era: Strategies to Increase Transparency and Accountability,” vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 129–145, 2025, doi: 10.24198/cosmogov.v11i1.62484.

A. A. Renanda and A. Rosidin, “Efektivitas Pelayanan Digital Dalam Mempermudah Birokrasi Dan Pengelolaan Data Publik,” vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 1651–1657, 2025, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.59837/jpnmb.v1i8.310.

N. A. Assegaf, “DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SECTOR FOR IMPROVING PUBLIC SERVICES THROUGH AN E-GOVERNMENT APPROACH,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 695–703, 2024, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.33068/iccd.v4i1.678.

E. W. Millensyah, “Dampak Transformasi Digital terhadap Pelayanan Publik,” vol. 14, no. 02, pp. 199–207, 2024, doi: DOI : https://doi.org/10.33005/jdg.v14i2.5454.

H. Wasly, “Impact of e-Government Services on Private Sector: An Empirical Assessment Model,” vol. 7, no. 3, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.03650.

N. G. O. Tan and V. U. Khanh, “The critical factors affecting E-Government adoption: A Conceptual Framework in Vietnam,” 2025.

S. Toro-maureira, U. Mayor, A. Olivares, and U. Mayor, “The Missing Link: Identifying Digital Intermediaries in E‑Government,” no. 2021, pp. 1–29, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.10846.

D. M. Saragih, T. Sabrina, and A. Purwoko, “The Influence Of Easy Business Licensing Through The Implementation Of Online Single Submission ( OSS ) Applications On Increasing Investment In North Sumatra Province ( Mid Large Scale Industrial Sector ),” pp. 25–32, 2024, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v5i1.1049.

Cidan Sangmu, “The Application and Impact of E-government Services in Administrative Licensing,” Journal, Acad. Issn, Manag., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 84–89, 2024, doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2024.061211.

M. Rahayu, K. Fadila, and A. Purnomo, “The Impact of E-Government System Policy on Employee Performance and its Influence on the Effectiveness of Public Services in the Regional Government of Pesawaran Regency,” vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 108–118, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2024.23.2.2.

V. Lehdonvirta, A. Oksanen, P. Räsänen, and G. Blank, “Social Media , Web , and Panel Surveys : Using Non ‐ Probability Samples in Social and Policy Research,” pp. 134–155, 2020, doi: 10.1002/poi3.238.

A. David et al., “Understanding Local Government Digital Technology Adoption Strategies : A PRISMA Review,” pp. 1–43, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129645.

V. Indama, “Digital Governance: Citizen Perceptions and Expectations of Online Public Services,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 12–18, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.1.2.3.

S. C. Srivastava and T. S. H. Teo, “Citizen Trust Development for E-Government Adoption and Usage : Insights from Young Adults in Singapore,” vol. 25, 2024, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.02531.

C. Song and J. Lee, “Citizens ’ Use of Social Media in Government , Perceived Transparency , and Trust in Government,” no. February, 2020, doi: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798.

A. K. AbdulKareem, “Impact of Digital Literacy on E-Government Utilization,” 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2023-0196.

S. R. Virnandes, J. Shen, E. Vlahu-gjorgievska, R. Virnandes, J. Shen, and E. Vlahu-gjorgievska, “Science Direct Building public trust through digital government transformation : A Building public trust through digital government transformation : qualitative study of Indonesian civil service agency qualitative study of Indonesian civil service agency,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 234, pp. 1183–1191, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.114.

B. Zhao, S. Cheng, K. Jackson, and Y. Kim, “Digital transparency and citizen participation : Evidence from the online crowdsourcing platform of the City of Sacramento,” vol. 40, no. September, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101868.

C. Hofisi and L. E. Chigova, “Rethinking the Role of Local Government in Service Delivery in South Africa : Towards Digital Transformation,” vol. 2, no. 14, pp. 64–76, 2023, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20234147.

Z. Abdussamad, L. Judijanto, A. Yusup, A. Muhammad, H. Tamrin, and D. Rosyalita, “Enhancing Public Service Delivery through Digital Transformation : Challenges and Opportunities in the Era of E-Government,” vol. 22, pp. 22539–22551, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001601.

H. Li, “Impact of Digital Government on Digital Transformation of Enterprises from the Perspective of Urban Economic Sustainable Development,” no. October 2023, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072667.

M. A. M. Albuainain, “How digital communication provides better government services: Assessing the Tawasul System in Bahrain,” Cities, vol. 128, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103790.

A. Mamary et al., “A comprehensive conceptual model of digital transformation in public services : exploring key factors and their impact on government success,” 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093‑025‑00621‑8.

D. Wulandari, M. A. Rahawarin, and A. R. Sakir, “The influence of e-government system implementation on the accessibility of public health services,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 118–130, 2025, doi: 10.69816/jgd.v2i2.45269.

W. Shakira, “Optimizing Organizational Government Public Services Communication in Improving Abstract,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 45–51, 2024, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/communicase.v1i2.

E. A. Saepudin, G. Hartoko, M. Zulfikar, and A. N. Priatna, “Public management communication strategy in managing accessibility of public services for persons with disabilities in Serang city,” vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2024, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v12i1.247.

D. F. Adni, S. Rusadi, and T. Baharuddin, “Adaptive Policy in Website-Based Digitization of Government Public Services : A Thematic Analysis,” J. Local Gov. Issues ( LOGOS ), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2024, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v7i1.29404.

R. P. Nurdiarti, “Communication and E - Government : The Case Study of E - Government Implementation in Tourism Communications in the Tourism Department , Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta ( DIY ) Province,” vol. 22, no. November, pp. 117–127, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.32274.

Mambang, “Politeia : Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations Digital Governance in Transition : A Narrative Review of E-Government,” J. Public Adm. Polit. Sci. Int. Relations E-ISSN, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 172–185, 2024, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.61978/politeia.v2i3.960.

A. S. Sugiarti, Eggy Fajar Andalas, Desain Penelitian Kualitatif Sastra. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2020.

A. Rijali, “Analisis Data Kualitatif,” Alhadharah J. Ilmu Dakwah, vol. 17, no. 33, p. 81, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&d, edisi 2, Esisi 2. Bandungalfabeta, 2019.

M. Firmansyah and I. Artikel, “Esensi Perbedaan Metode Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif,” vol. 3, no. 2, 2021.

Muri. yusuf, “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/MT_Globalization_Report_2018.pdf%0Ahttp://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43447/1/India_globalisation%2C society and inequalities%28lsero%29.pdf%0Ahttps://www.quora.com/What-is-the

G. Mahlangu and E. Ruhode, “Factors Enhancing E‑Government Service Gaps in a Developing Country Context,” pp. 422–440, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.09803.

J. Jacob, P. Latupeirissa, N. Luh, Y. Dewi, I. K. R. Prayana, and M. B. Srikandi, “Transforming Public Service Delivery : A Comprehensive Review of Digitization Initiatives,” 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818.

M. A. A. dan Dimas, “Implementation Of E-Government In Public Services (Study At The Kedungasri Village Office, Tegaldlimo District, Banyuwangi Regency,” Nusant. Hasana J., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 209–217, 2024, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v4i3.1181.

A. Wahyudi, “Digital Transformation in Public Service Management : Addressing Challenges in the Modern Era,” vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1243–1252, 2024, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v3i4.409.

A. P. Manoharan, J. Melitski, and M. Holzer, “Digital Governance : An Assessment of Performance,” Public Organ. Rev., pp. 265–283, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11115-021-00584-8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.