Life Must Go On: Serving People without Ulterior Motives as Responses to Mount Sinabung Eruption

Norita Novalina Sembiring, Sarmauli, Yosep Kambu, Haposan Silalahi, Agnes Beatrix Jackline Raintung

Abstract

Disasters have become part of the realities of life on this earth. Global disasters such as nuclear war, pandemics, earthquakes, and mount eruptions threaten the sustainability of human civilization. The purpose of this research is to provide services to victims of the eruption of Mount Sinabung, that life must go on. The eruption of Mount Sinabung, which has reached its eleventh year, is a fact of the severity of the struggles experienced by the people of Karo Land, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Natural disasters have an impact not only physically but also psychologically. The disaster victims must be accompanied by mental, spiritual, and spirit because life must go on. This condition needs to get responses from many stakeholders, one of which is the church. The church as a community of believers cannot be separated from the social life that surrounds it. The church exists in a public space filled with various struggles. For this task, the church is challenged to carry out its mission without ulterior motives because it is solely driven by compassion rooted in God's love for humankind. The novelty of this research is on the technique of motivating that God loves his people.

 

Keywords: church, diakonia, disaster, ulterior motives, public space.


Full Text:

PDF


References


ADILA I., DEWI W.W.A., TAMITIADINI D., and SYAUKI W.R. Disaster mitigation action plan: Digital media on improving accountability and community relationships. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017, 70(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012016.

KARVER A.J.H. What is a disaster? Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2(1-4): 152-153, 1986. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X00030661.

JOVITA H.D., NASHIR H., MUTIARIN D., MONER Y., and NURMANDI A. Social capital and disasters: How does social capital shape post-disaster conditions in the Philippines? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(4): 519-534, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2018.1556143.

MALAU W., and GINTING W.C. Peranan Gereja Batak Karo Protestan dalam Mempertahankan dan Melestarikan Budaya Etnis Karo di Kabanjahe. Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology, 2016, 2(2): 130. DOI: 10.24114/antro.v2i2.5282.

STRAUSS J., and CORBIN A. Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications, 1990.

NEUMAN W.L. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 2006: 378-417.

SIBURIAN S., and SINAGA D. Kabar dari Tanah Karo Simalem Kiprah GBKP Melayani Korban Bencana Letusan Gunung Sinabung. Sumatera Utara, Moderamen Gereja Batak Karo, 2016.

MORI M., MCDERMOTT R., SAGALA S., and WULANDARI Y. Sinabung volcano: how culture shapes community resilience. Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, 2019, 28(3): 290-303. DOI: 10.1108/DPM-05-2018-0160.

SUWARSONO, HIDAYAT, NUGROHO J.T., WIWEKA, PARWATI, and KHOMARUDIN M.R. Detecting the Affected Areas of Mount Sinabung Eruption Using Landsat 8 Imageries Based on Reflectance Change. International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, 2017, 12(1): 49. DOI: 10.30536/j.ijreses.2015.v12.a2672.

PASARIBU I., and ADELA F.P. Mount Sinabung Eruption Collaboration Model in a Disaster Political Perspective. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 2019, 11(1): 30-48. DOI: 10.32734/politeia.v11i1.706.

GUNAWAN H., SURONOA, BUDIANTOA A., KRISTIANTOA, PRAMBADAA O., MCCAUSLANDB W., PALLISTERB J., and IGUCHIC M. Overview of the eruptions of Sinabung Volcano, 2010 and 2013 – present and details of the 2013 phreatomagmatic phase. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2019, 382: 103-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.08.005.

KADAVI P.R., LEE W.J., and LEE C.W. Analysis of the pyroclastic flow deposits of Mount Sinabung and Merapi using Landsat imagery and the artificial neural networks approach. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(9). DOI: 10.3390/app7090935.

SCHWARTZ P.M. Privacy and Democracy in Cyberspace. Vanderbilt Law Review, 2021, 52(6): 1609-1670. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.205449.

GORA R.B., WEBER M., and COMTE A. Melacak peran agama dalam ruang publik. Jurnal Filsafat Teologi, 2019, 165(1): 1-13. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/LOGOS/article/view/562/pdf88.

BRADSTOCK A. Doing Theology in a Straitened Public Square. International Journal of Public Theology, 2015, 9: 212-227. [Online]. Available: https://reader.zlibcdn.com/articles/ccdf36494535d67e17f840719f6b2b4d/1.jpg.

RAUCHFLEISCH A. The public sphere as an essentially contested concept: A co-citation analysis of the last 20 years of public sphere research. Communication and the Public, 2017, 2(1): 3-18. DOI: 10.1177/2057047317691054.

FERRELL R.E., and OLD J. The Force of the Better Argument: Americans Can Learn Something from Jurgen Habermas and ‘Deliberative Democracy. Open Journal of Philosophy, 6(3): 215-238. 2016, DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2016.63021.

HARIYONO E. and LILIASARI S. The Characteristics of Volcanic Eruption in Indonesia. In book: Volcanoes - Geological and Geophysical Setting, Theoretical Aspects and Numerical Modeling, Applications to Industry and Their Impact on the Human Health. InTech Open, 2018, i(tourism): 74-94. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71449.

WILLIAMS E.L. Ecumenical and global perspectives on the diaconate. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, 2015.

EVERIST N.C., and MARTY M.E. Seventy Images of Grace in the Epistles…: That Make All the Difference in Daily Life. Kindle Edition, 2015.

VAN DE BEEK A. Religion without ulterior motive. Theological Studies, 2005, 61(1-2): 517-529. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v61i1/2.425.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.