Revisiting the Epistemology of the Sociology of Religion according to Contemporary Indonesian Muslim Figures in NU, Muhammadiyah, and PERSIS
Abstract
K.H. Ali Yafie and K.H. Sahal Mahfudh may be regarded as representatives of the NU traditionalist faction, particularly in their approaches to interpreting the Qur’an. The Majlis Tarjih of Persatuan Islam (PERSIS) may be seen as representing the puritan tendency, while Dawam Rahardjo, associated with Muhammadiyah intellectual circles, developed a modernist interpretation of the Qur’an in relation to social contexts. Traditionalist and puritan groups are often categorized as forms of orthodoxy, whereas modernist approaches are commonly associated with heterodoxy. This study examines whether such categorizations are consistent with their interpretations of social verses in the Qur’an and whether their interpretive approaches demonstrate methodological dynamism. The study aims to analyze the dynamics of contemporary Indonesian Islamic figures in understanding religious texts related to social themes. It employs content analysis of selected works grounded in Qur’anic doctrines, using an Ulumul Qur’an approach that integrates social-scientific perspectives into the contemporary paradigm of Qur’anic studies. The research objects were selected on the basis that the figures under study served as advisors or influential intellectuals within Indonesian Islamic mass organizations in their respective periods. The findings show that K.H. Ali Yafie and K.H. Sahal Mahfudh emphasized the importance of a comprehensive and integrated approach to thematic interpretation of Qur’anic verses. Dawam Rahardjo’s Encyclopedia of the Qur’an represents a combination of comparative interpretation (al-tafsīr al-muqāran) and thematic vocabulary-based interpretation. In the social sphere, the puritan approach appears to be guided by the principle that matters related to worldly and social affairs are permissible unless explicitly prohibited by the Qur’an or authentic Hadith. Persatuan Islam (PERSIS), through its official institution known as the Hisbah Council, conducts collective ijtihad (ijtihad jamā‘ī) when addressing issues not directly covered by the explicit texts of the Qur’an and Hadith.
Keywords: Collective ijtihad; Integrated interpretation; Thematic interpretation; Comparative interpretation; Qur’anic studies; Indonesian Islam.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London; Washington [D.C.]: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Azra, A. (2000). Islam Substantif: Menggagas Paradigma Baru Islam Indonesia. Bandung: Mizan.
Baidan, N. (2005). Metodologi Penafsiran Al-Qur’an (3rd ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Chalil, M. (1952). Al-Qur’an dari Masa ke Masa. Semarang: CV. Ramadhani.
Chalil, M. (1989). Kembali kepada Al-Qur’an dan as-Sunnah (7th ed.). Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Hassan, A. (1972). Risalah Al-Qur’an dan al-Sunnah.
Hassan, A. (n.d.). Tafsir al-Furqan. Semarang: Toha Putera.
Iyāzī, A.-S. M. ‘Alī. (1373). Al-Mufassirūn: Ḥayātuhum wa Manhajuhum. Teheran: Wizārah aṡ-Ṡaqāfah wa al-Irsyād al-Islāmī.
Jamil, M. M., Musahadi, M., Anwar, C., & Kholiq, A. (2007). Nalar Islam Nusantara: Studi Islam Ala Muhammadiyah, Al-Irsyad, Persis dan NU. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi Islam Depag RI.
Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: The Islamic Texts Society.
Kamiluddin, U. (2006). Menyorot ijtihad Persis: Fungsi dan Peranannya dalam Pembinaan Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Tafakur.
Khaeruman, B. (2010). Persatuan Islam: Sejarah Pembentukan Pemikiran kembali kepada Al-Qur’an dan al-Sunnah (1st ed.). Bandung: FAPPI Press and IRIS.
Khairurrijal, K. (2020). EKSISTENSI PONDOK PESANTREN DI TENGAH KEMODERNAN PESANTREN. El -Hekam, 4(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.31958/jeh.v4i2.2013
Mahfudh, S. (2003, June). Fiqh Sosial: Upaya Pengembangan Madzhab Qauli dan Manhaji. Speech of Doctor Honoris Causa presented at the Doctor Honoris Causa, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Mahfudh, S. (2007). Nuansa Fiqh Sosial (6th ed.). Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Majelis Tarjih dan Pengembangan Pemikiran Islam. (2000). Tafsir tematik Al-Qur’an: Tentang hubungan sosial antarumat beragama. Pustaka SM.
Mudzhar, A. (2008). PESANTREN TRANSFORMATIF: RESPON PESANTREN TERHADAP PERUBAHAN SOSIAL. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v6i2.186
Nasution, H. (1975). Islam Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Aspek (Vol. 1). Depok: UI Press.
Rahardjo, M. D. (1999). Masyarakat Madani: Agama, Kelas Menengah dan Perubahan Sosial (1st ed.). Jakarta: LP3ES.
Rahardjo, M. D., & Rachman, B. M. (2002). Ensiklopedi Al-Qur’ān: Tafsir Sosial Berdasarkan Konsep-Konsep Kunci. Jakarta: Paramadina.
Rosadisastra, A. (2011). Mencari Akar Teologis Makna Doktriner dan Universal dalam Islam: Perspektif ‘Ulûm al-Tafsîr. Al-Fath, 5(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.32678/alfath.v5i1.3242
Ruswanto, R. (2017). Pesantren dan Pembaharuan. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v7i1.1496
Shihab, M. Q. (1995). Membumikan Al-Qur’an: Fungsi dan Peran Wahyu dalam kehidupan Masyarakat (9th ed.). Bandung: Mizan.
Sidqon, A. (2013). Pesantren dan Tantangan Globalisasi. Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2013.1.1.1-11
Yafie, A. (1990). Memahami Al-Qur’an secara Integral. Ulumul Quran, 2(5).
Yafie, A. (1995). Menggagas Fiqih Sosial (3rd ed.). Bandung: Mizan.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.


