Effects of Digital Learning Platforms on Academic Achievement among Secondary School Students: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of digital learning platforms on students' academic performance at the secondary education level. The objective is to analyze key factors such as engagement, accessibility, and instructional effectiveness. A mixed-methods approach was used, with data collected from 1,200 students across various high schools through surveys, standardized test scores, and in-depth interviews with educators. The results revealed that students who actively engaged with digital learning platforms showed a significant improvement in academic performance, with an average increase of 5.12 points (from 75.02 to 80.14, p < 0.01) compared to those relying on traditional methods. Personalized learning experiences and interactive content were also found to enhance student motivation and understanding, contributing to higher retention rates. However, challenges such as gaps in technology access and varying digital literacy levels were identified, exacerbating academic achievement gaps. These findings underscore the need for targeted policy interventions to ensure equitable access to digital education and optimize its effectiveness.
The study contributes to the growing body of research in educational technology and provides actionable insights for policymakers, educators, and developers seeking to improve student learning outcomes in the digital era.
Keywords: Digital Learning Platforms, Academic Performance, Engagement, Digital Literacy, Educational Technology.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Castro R. Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities // Education and Information Technologies. – 2019. – Vol. 24, № 4. – P. 2523–2546. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
Strielkowski W.; Grebennikova V.; Lisovskiy A.; Rakhimova G.; Vasileva T. AI-driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation // Sustainable Development. – 2024. DOI: 10.1002/sd.3221.
Artuso A. R., Graf S. T. Digital learning platforms and pedagogical context – a comparison between Brazil and Denmark // Learning Tech – Tidsskrift for Læremidler, Didaktik og Teknologi. – 2019. – Vol. 6. – P. 1–43. – URL: https://learningtech.laeremiddel.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Digital-learning-platforms-and-local-context-web.pdf
Hasbi M., Purnama R. Reflection of English language teaching for high school students using E-LISDA e-learning platform // LinguaEducare: Journal of English and Linguistic Studies. – 2024. – Vol. 1, № 1. – P. 51–60. DOI: 10.63324/lec.1v.1i.6.
Song C., Shin S.-Y., Shin K.-S. Implementing the Dynamic Feedback-Driven Learning Optimization Framework: A Machine Learning Approach to Personalize Educational Pathways // Applied Sciences. – 2024. – Vol. 14, № 2. – Art. 916. DOI: 10.3390/app14020916
Avella J. T., Kebritchi M., Nunn S. G., Kanai T. Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review // Online Learning. – 2016. – Vol. 20, № 2. – P. 13–29. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v20i2.790
Devlin T. J., Feldhaus C. R., Bentrem K. M. The evolving classroom: A study of traditional and technology-based instruction in a STEM classroom // Journal of Technology Education. – 2013. – Vol. 25, № 1. – P. 34–54. DOI: 10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.3
Saeheng P. A study of e-learning, blended learning, and traditional teaching methods to motivate autonomous learning in English reading comprehension of Thais learners // Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. – 2017. – Vol. 2, № 1. – P. 1–20. – DOI: 10.21093/ijeltal.v2i1.36.
Miao G., Zander J., Sung K. W., Ben Slimane S. Fundamentals of Mobile Data Networks. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. – 322 p. – ISBN 978-1-107-14321-0. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316534298.
Abid N. Advancements and best practices in data loss prevention: A comprehensive review // Global Journal of Universal Studies. – 2024. – Vol. 1, № 1. – P. 190–225. – ISSN 3008-0509
Ikawati F. R., Haris M. S. Challenges in implementing digital medical records in Indonesian hospitals: Perspectives on technology, regulation, and data security // Proceedings of the International Conference of Innovation, Science, Technology, Education, Children, and Health. – 2024. – Vol. 4, № 2. – P. 1–25. DOI: 10.62951/icistech.v4i2.70
Morara G. N.; Makworo E. O.; Abuya T. K. Ranking challenges facing digital literacy programme in primary schools in Kisii County, Kenya // International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science. – 2020. – Vol. 9, № 5. – P. 302–306. – DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.829
Wairumbi M. W. Critical Success Factors to the Implementation of Digital Literacy Programme in Public Schools in Kenya: a Case Study of Langata and Westlands Constituencies in Nairobi County: Master’s thesis. – Nairobi: University of Nairobi, 2021. – 84 p. – URL: https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/155878
Rajasekaran S.; Adam T.; Tilmes K. Digital Pathways for Education: Enabling Greater Impact for All. – Washington, DC: The World Bank Group, 2024. – ISBN 978-1-4648-1404-4. – URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10986/41021
Kemendikbudristek. Laporan sekolah di Indonesia mengadopsi sistem pembelajaran daring selama pandemi. – Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi, 2022.
Reimers F. M. Learning from a pandemic. The impact of COVID-19 on education around the world // In: Reimers F. M. (Ed.) Primary and Secondary Education During COVID-19. – Cham: Springer, 2022. – P. 1–37. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81500-4_1.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics; UNICEF; OECD; World Bank. From Learning Recovery to Education Transformation: Insights and Reflections from the 4th Survey of National Education Responses to COVID-19 School Closures. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022. – DOI: 10.1787/a79f55ac-en.
Epifanovsky E.; et al. Software for the frontiers of quantum chemistry: An overview of developments in the Q-Chem 5 package // The Journal of Chemical Physics. – 2021. – Vol. 155, № 8. – Art. 084801. DOI: 10.1063/5.0055522.
OECD; FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022–2031. – Paris: OECD Publishing; Rome: FAO, 2022. – DOI: 10.1787/f1b0b29c-en.
Latha S. Digital divide among Malaysian tertiary students and its impact on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Master’s thesis. – Kampar: Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, 2023. – 120 p. – URL: https://eprints.utar.edu.my/5910
Haleem A.; Javaid M.; Qadri M. A.; Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review // Sustainable Operations and Computers. – 2022. – Vol. 3. – P. 275–285. DOI: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.
Almeida F. Strategies to perform a mixed methods study // European Journal of Education Studies. – 2018. – Vol. 5, № 1. – P. 137–150. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1406214.
Mehrvarz M.; Heidari E.; Farrokhnia M.; Noroozi O. The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students’ digital competence and their academic performance // Computers & Education. – 2021. – Vol. 167. – Art. 104184. – DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184.
Shuja A.; Qureshi I. A.; Schaeffer D. M.; Zareen M. Effect of M-Learning on Students’ Academic Performance Mediated by Facilitation Discourse and Flexibility // Knowledge Management & E-Learning. – 2019. – Vol. 11, № 2. – P. 158–200. – DOI: 10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.009.
Temel T.; Cesur K. The Effect of Gamification with Web 2.0 Tools on EFL Learners’ Motivation and Academic Achievement in Online Learning Environments // SAGE Open. – 2024. – Vol. 14, № 2. – Art. 21582440241247928. DOI: 10.1177/21582440241247928.
Zhang Y.; Wildemuth B. M. Qualitative analysis of content // In: Wildemuth B. M. (Ed.) Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. – Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2009. – P. 308–319.
Bush T. Authenticity in research: Reliability, validity and triangulation // In: Briggs A.; Coleman M.; Morrison M. (Eds.) Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management. – 3rd ed. – London: SAGE, 2012. – P. 75–89. DOI: 10.4135/9781473957695.n6.
Finn J. D.; Rock D. A. Academic success among students at risk for school failure // Journal of Applied Psychology. – 1997. – Vol. 82, № 2. – P. 221–234. – DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221.
Al-Qahtani A. A. Y.; Higgins S. E. Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students’ achievement in higher education // Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. – 2013. – Vol. 29, № 3. – P. 220–234. – DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00490.x.
Fullan M.; Watson N. School-based management: Reconceptualizing to improve learning outcomes // School Effectiveness and School Improvement. – 2000. – Vol. 11, № 4. – P. 453–473. – DOI: 10.1076/sesi.11.4.453.3561.
Qureshi M. A.; Khaskheli A.; Qureshi J. A.; Raza S. A.; Yousufi S. Q. Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement // Interactive Learning Environments. – 2023. – Vol. 31, № 4. – P. 2371–2391. – DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886.
Khan B. H. (Ed.) Flexible Learning in an Information Society. – Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2007. – 374 p. – ISBN 978-1-59904-325-8. – DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.
Ajani O. A. The role of educational technology in enhancing professional development and teaching competence among secondary school teachers // International Journal of Development and Sustainability. – 2024. – Vol. 13, № 7. – P. 588–606.
Mumtaz S. Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature // Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education. – 2000. – Vol. 9, № 3. – P. 319–342. – DOI: 10.1080/14759390000200096.
Rahiem M. Technological barriers and challenges in the use of ICT during the COVID-19 emergency remote learning // Universal Journal of Educational Research. – 2020. – Vol. 8, № 12. – P. 612–623. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.082248.
Baer W. S. Will the Internet Transform Higher Education? – Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1998. – 20 p. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP685.html
Protopsaltis S.; Baum S. Does Online Education Live Up to Its Promise? A Look at the Evidence and Implications for Federal Policy. – George Mason University, Center for Education Policy and Evaluation, 2019. – 50 p.
Bates T. The continuing evolution of ICT capacity: The implications for education // In: Farrell G. M. (Ed.) The Changing Faces of Virtual Education. – Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning, 2001. – P. 29–46.
Singh P.; Bhadoria M. S.; Shrivastava M. V. Ed Tech Platform // In: Vidyarthi A.; Gupta D.; Kushawah J. S. (Eds.) Computational Technologies in Project Based Learning. – Gwalior: Publication House, 2022. – P. 148–155. – ISBN 978-81-978432-5-9.
Vora D. Emerging Ed-Tech and Accessibility: Master’s thesis. – Denton, TX: University of North Texas, 2013. – 158 p. URL: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc407857
Shihab S. R.; Sultana N.; Samad A.; Hamza M. Educational technology in teaching community: Reviewing the dimension of integrating Ed-Tech tools and ideas in classrooms // Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies. – 2023. – Vol. 3, № 6. – P. 1028–1039. – DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v3i6.835.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
