Diurnal Thermal Comfort Variations and Model-User Perception Gaps in a Tropical Peatland Campus

Akbar Rahman, Farhadur Reza, Muhammad Tharziansyah, Muhammad Haidar Nur Farras

Abstract

This study investigates the diurnal variation of outdoor thermal comfort and the discrepancy between the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and the Thermal Sensation Vote (TSV) in a humid tropical campus environment. The research was conducted at Lambung Mangkurat University, located in a wetland area with dense tropical vegetation. Data collection combined microclimatic measurements—air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation—with thermal perception surveys administered to 150 students during two time intervals: 11:00–12:00 and 15:00–16:00 over five days. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diurnal variation in thermal comfort and examine the discrepancy between model-predicted and user-perceived sensations. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of objective PMV calculations with subjective TSV responses in a tropical peatland context, revealing critical model limitations and informing adaptive design strategies. Results indicate that midday PMV values ranged from +0.88 to +1.30, exceeding ASHRAE-defined comfort thresholds and reflecting “warm to slightly hot” conditions. In the afternoon, PMV values dropped to a more neutral range (0.00 to +0.50). However, TSV responses revealed greater discomfort, particularly at midday, with most respondents reporting sensations from “slightly warm” to “warm” (TSV +1 to +2). This indicates a notable gap between model predictions and actual user perceptions. These findings highlight limitations of the PMV model in representing outdoor comfort in humid tropical contexts and suggest the need for locally adapted or adaptive-based models. Recommendations include implementing time-sensitive design strategies, increasing effective vegetative shading in active areas, and incorporating semi-permanent architectural elements such as pergolas and porous canopies. Such interventions support climate-responsive campus design and contribute to sustainable development goals in tropical higher education settings.

 

Keywords: thermal comfort; predicted mean vote; thermal sensation vote; tropical campus; outdoor microclimate.

 

https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.52.6.4


Full Text:

PDF


References


Lan, L., Tsuzuki, K., Liu, Y., Lian, Z., & Wong, N. H. (2021). Thermal comfort and learning performance in university classrooms: A survey-based study in summer. Building and Environment, 203, 108098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108098

Al Horr, Y., Arif, M., Kaushik, A., Mazroei, A., Elsarrag, E., & Mishra, S. (2016). Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature. Building and Environment, 105, 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.001

Teli, D., Tzempelikos, A., & Geng, Y. (2020). Adaptive thermal comfort for educational buildings in warm-humid climates. Energy and Buildings, 206, 109593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109593

Zhang, H., Arens, E., Zhai, Y., & Pasut, W. (2020). Review of the dynamic thermal sensation model and its applications. Building and Environment, 180, 107067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107067

Yao, Q., Liu, J., Yang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Diurnal outdoor thermal comfort in educational courtyards under humid-subtropical climate. Building and Environment, 212, 108837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108837

Tartarini, F., Schiavon, S., Cheung, T., & Hoyt, T. (2021). Indoor environmental quality and student performance in tropical university classrooms. Energy and Buildings, 250, 111278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111278

Liu, H., Ma, X., Zhang, Z., Cheng, X., Chen, Y., & Kojima, S. (2021). Relationship between thermal comfort and learning efficiency in classrooms during hot seasons. Energies, 14(19), 6338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196338

Hwang, R.-L., Lin, T.-P., Cheng, M.-J., & Chien, J.-H. (2019). Exploring thermal comfort conditions for natural ventilation in classrooms in tropical regions. Building and Environment, 148, 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.012

Yang, Y., Li, B., Liu, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Influence of vegetation and building configuration on outdoor thermal comfort in educational campuses. Building and Environment, 219, 109149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109149

Park, S., Lee, J., & Lee, D. (2021). Evaluation of thermal comfort in outdoor learning spaces of university campuses. Sustainability, 13(6), 3129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063129

Nikolopoulou, M., & Lykoudis, S. (2021). Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: Understanding the human perspective. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65, 102629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102629

Tajadura, A., Muñoz, A. A., & León, L. D. (2022). Effects of tree canopy cover and pavement materials on outdoor thermal comfort in educational campuses in humid regions. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 70, 127556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127556

ASHRAE. (2020). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

Nicol, F., Humphreys, M., & Roaf, S. (2020). Adaptive thermal comfort: Principles and practice. Routledge.

de Dear, R., & Jay, O. (2022). Adaptation in thermal comfort research: Criteria for identifying and evaluating strategies. Building and Environment, 207, 108414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108414

Lin, Y.-J., Lin, T.-P., & Hwang, R.-L. (2021). Evaluating pedestrian comfort in tropical outdoor campuses through canopy structure simulation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 206, 103974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103974


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.