Advantages and Disadvantages of Digitalization of Learning and Assessments of Scientific Knowledge in the Second Cycle

Najoi El Hazzat, Abderrazzak Mazouak

Abstract

The continuous evolution of technological approaches and the spread of new technologies in teaching and learning practices within schools have undoubtedly demonstrated the advantages of using digital technology in learning assessment practices within and outside the classroom. Faced with a multitude of technological choices, the trainer and teachers are called upon first to filter the teaching methods in order to plan educational scenarios capable of answering the various problematic questions of the digitalization of learning and the evaluation of scientific knowledge in the second cycle. To address this problem, we opted for export research, whose recommended methodology is based on a multidimensional survey, in which we first questioned teachers about the use of new technologies in the learning and assessment process and then identified the degree of motivation and commitment of students in innovative situations in scientific knowledge (life and earth sciences). The objective of our research is to evaluate the effect of digitalization on the teaching of life and earth sciences, which is represented by four secondary education establishments (from the Taza delegation), with a varied population of 356 students at all levels and scientific streams, as well as 62 teachers of life and earth sciences. Finally, we confirm that despite the satisfaction of the majority of teachers and students with regard to the functional qualities and contribution of technological tools in assessment practices, drawbacks have been noted at the technical, spatiotemporal, and organizational levels.

 

Keywords: digitalization; evaluation practice; new technologies; advantages; disadvantages

 

https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.51.11.12


Full Text:

PDF


References


MOTTET G. Educational technology. French Review of Pedagogy, 1983, 63 : 7-12.

COLLIN S., and KARSENTI T. Use of technologies in education: analysis of sociocultural issues. Education and Francophonie, 2013, 41(1): 192-210. Retrieved from http://www.acelf.ca/c/revue/pdf/EF-41-1-192_COLLIN.pdf

TARDIF J. Skills assessment: Documenting the development path. Montreal, 2006.

MILLERAND F. Usages des NTIC : les approches de la diffusion, de l’innovation et de l’appropriation (1ère partie) CoMMposite, 1998.

SCALLON G. L’évaluation des apprentissages dans une approche par compétences. De Boeck, 2007.

TAROUCO L., and HACK L. New tools for assessment in distance education. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Chesapeake, VA, AACE, 2000, pp. 241-244.

RIZZA C., MORIN S., & LEMARCHAND S. The “instrumented” evaluation in FOAD: a communicational approach to this tutorial activity between diagnosis of the device and monitoring of the learner. International Journal of Information Sciences for Decision Making, 2006, Special Issue 25, TICE Méditerranée, Humans in distance learning, the challenges of assessment, Genoa, May 26-27. 12 pages. http://isdm.univ-tln.fr/PDF/isdm25/Rizza_TICE2006.pdf

DESPONT A. Defining an online assessment strategy. Symetrix. Excerpts, 2008: http://www.elearningsymetrix.fr/blog/index.php?post/2008/02/25/Livre-blanc-Definir-une-strategie-devaluation-en-ligne

ARDOINO J., & BERGER G. L’évaluation comme interprétation. Pour, 1986, 107: 120-127

GREMION C., & LEROUX J.L. L’évaluation à l’épreuve de la distance et du numérique. Questions Vives, 2019, 31: 1-7, https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsvives.3738


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.