Emerging Lines of Research Related to Ecological Compensation Models. A Bibliometric Review Study
Abstract
There are multiple models of ecological compensation found in the scientific literature; however, these models are directed to particular case studies and consequently show the absence of a universally applicable model. The current ecological crisis requires effective solutions for the consumption of ecosystem components through compensation. From this perspective, this study aims to identify emerging lines of research in the field of ecological compensation from a bibliometric study in the scientific databases of Scopus and Web of Science based on the exploration of 186 articles using VOSviewer software. It is also intended to analyze the identified clusters. The findings allowed the identification of three emerging research trends in this field through cluster grouping: 1) multivariate statistical models for ecological compensation, and 2) models based on compensation accounting and the value of ecosystem services.3 Valuation models for ecological compensation of geographic mapping. After analyzing each of these trends, it is concluded that there is no single model for the universal application of ecological compensation, so it is necessary to build valuation coefficients that allow homogenizing the magnitudes that come from the multiple measurements used in the identified approaches. It is proposed to build standardized and generally accepted ecological compensation models that materialize successful solutions to achieve compensation derived from the use of ecological components in the management of productive, social, and environmental projects.
Keywords: sustainability; ecological compensation; valuation
Full Text:
PDFReferences
FEIJOO G, ARIAS A, & MOREIRA M T. Aplicación de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Elaboración de Artículos Científicos de Review: Uso del Software VOSVIEWER con las Redes Bibliométricas, 2022. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13039.51365
FU Y, XIONG K, & ZHANG Z. Ecosystem services and ecological compensation of world heritage: A literature review. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2021, 60: 125968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2021.125968
XIA Y, DONG L, HUANG C, PENG R, JIANG F, YANG W, & DENG J. Multiobjective Optimization for Eco-Compensation Space Selection based on Gross Ecosystem Product. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2023, 9: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34133/ehs.0095
BUCHELI GUERRERO V A. Desarrollo del estado del arte en investigación: una herramienta basada en inteligencia artificial. Revista Politécnica, 2019, 15(30): 70–81. https://doi.org/10.33571/rpolitec.v15n30a7
GALDO JIMÉNEZ A. J. Impacto del mindfulness en el rendimiento académico de estudiantes universitarios: una revisión sistemática de literatura con VOSviewer. EDUCA, 2021, (17): 1-36. Article 6. https://doi.org/10.35756/educaumch.202117.151.
GALVEZ C. Co-word analysis applied to highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (2007-2017). Transinformação 2018, 30(3): 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892018000300001
WEN Q. Review of ecological compensation in China’s mining exploitation regions. Shengtai Xuebao, 2014, 34(21): 6058–6066. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201312052898
BORGES-MATOS C, MARON M, & METZGER J P. A Review of Condition Metrics Used in Biodiversity Offsetting. Environmental Management, 2023, 72(4): 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01858-1
MARON M. The University of Queensland. Maron’s research areas. 2022, https://environment.uq.edu.au/profile/9305/martine-maron
ARICO S. International Science Council, 2022. https://council.science/es/members/
IBC-CARBON. Un importante premio internacional para el director de investigación Atte Moilanen por la promoción de la conservación de la naturaleza. 2018. https://www.ibccarbon.fi/en-US/Current/A_significant_international_award_to_Res(47293)
PEÑA E J, & ROLDÁN J. Las Ciencias Ambientales: Un Área Del Conocimiento Para El Desarrollo De Enfoques Interdisciplinarios. Ambiente y Sostenibilidad, 2013, 2(1): 38. https://doi.org/10.25100/ays.v2i1.4325
MARON M, HOBBS R J, MOILANEN A, MATTHEWS J W, CHRISTIE K, GARDNER T A, KEITH D A, LINDENMAYER D B, & MCALPINE C A. Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation, 2012, 155: 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.003
ZHANG Y, GUAN D, WU L, SU X, ZHOU L, & PENG G. How can an ecological compensation threshold be determined? A discriminant model integrating the minimum data approach and the most appropriate land use scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 852(66): 158377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158377
BURGER J. Environmental management: Integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 400(1–3): 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.041
HADY ZAPATA A, & CASTILLEJO SALCEDO L V. El modelo de reforestación China, ventajas y desventajas para su aplicación en el sistema internacional. Perspectivas en Inteligencia, 2022, 13(22): 77–100. https://doi.org/10.47961/2145194x.272
SONG F, ZHANG K, & SONG B. An Empirical Examination of Liability for Ecological Environment Restoration in the Context of the Civil Code of China. Heliyon, 2024, 10(11): e31240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31240
LI M, BADEEB R A, DOGAN E, GU X, & ZHANG H. Ecological footprints and sustainable environmental management: A critical view of China’s economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 347: 118994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118994
FENG D, WU W, LIANG L, LI L, & ZHAO G. Payments for watershed ecosystem services: mechanism, progress and challenges. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2018, 4(1): 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1434318
GAO X, SHEN J, HE W, SUN F, ZHANG Z, ZHANG X, YUAN L, & AN M. Multilevel governments’ decision-making process and its influencing factors in watershed ecological compensation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2019, 11(7): 1990, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071990
WUNDER S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 2015, 117: 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016.
WUNDER S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42, 2005. http://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001760
COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, FARBER S, GRASSO M, HANNON B, LIMBURG K, NAEEM S, O’NEILL R.V, PARUELO J, RASKIN R.G, SUTTON P, & VAN DEN BELT M. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
REID W, MOONEY H, CROPPER A, CAPISTRANO D, CARPENTER S, & CHOPRA K. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005
QIN YH, & KANG MY. A review of ecological compensation and its improvement measures. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22(4): 557-567
JIANG Y, YANG L, HU T, HOU W, LUO H, PAN H, LIU X, ZHENG X, ZHANG X, XIAO S, & SUN L. Measuring ecosystem services supply and demand in rural areas: cases from China’s key counties to receive assistance in pursuing rural revitalization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2024, 31(1): 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31208-x
DONG Y M, SUN B W, & XU L Y. Research and application of forest eco-compensation priority pattern: from the perspective of carbon sink quantity and variation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(5): 1892-1903.
QI Y, ZHANG T, CAO J, JIN C, CHEN T, SU Y, SU C, SANNIGRAHI S, MAITI A, TAO S, ZHANG Q, & LI T. Heterogeneity Impacts of Farmers’ Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Based on the Collective Action Framework. Land, 2022, 11(11): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112007
CHEN L, TIAN H, ZHANG X, FENG X, & YANG W. Public attitudes and perceptions to the West-to-East Pipeline Project and ecosystem management in large project construction. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2012, 19(3): 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.611189
CHEN Y-C, LI S, XU H-J, & QIAO X. Horizontal ecological compensation method for water resources in the ecological core area of central Hainan. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(4): 1149–1156.
GAO X, SHEN J, HE W, ZHAO X, LI Z, HU W, WANG J, REN Y, & ZHANG X. Spatial-temporal analysis of ecosystem services value and research on ecological compensation in Taihu Lake Basin of Jiangsu Province in China from 2005 to 2018. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 317: 128241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128241
WANG B, HE W, AN M, FANG X, & RAMSEY T S. Natural capital accounting of land resources based on ecological footprint and ecosystem services value. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 914: 170051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170051
LI H, & LU J. Can inter-governmental coordination inhibit cross-border illegal water pollution? A test based on cross-border ecological compensation policy. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 318: 115536, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115536
LI H, SU D, WANG J, & CAO Y. Optimizing the Compensation Standard of Cultivated Land Protection Based on Ecosystem Services in the Hangzhou Bay Area, China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2022, 14(4): 2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042372
LI J; MIN QW, LI W, BAI Y, YANG L, & DHRUBA G.C. (206d. C). Evaluation of water resources conserved by forests in the Hani rice terraces system of Honghe County, Yunnan, China: an application of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13(4): 744–753. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3469-y
CHENG P, LI J, ZHANG H, & CHENG G. Sustainable Management Behavior of Farmland Shelterbelt of Farmers in Ecologically Fragile Areas: Empirical Evidence from Xin Jiang China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2023, 15(3): 2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032011
LI J, HUANG L, CAO W, ZHAO J, & XU X. Ecosystems face the risk of ecological deficits in the southern foothills of the Himalayas. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 158: 111267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111267
WANG Z, WANG Y, ZHOU Z, YU F, MA D, & LI J. Combining spatial planning and ecosystem services value to assist ecological compensation decision-making—A case study of Yangtze River Delta ecological barrier, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 10: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1002014
ZHANG C, LI J, ZHOU Z, & SUN Y. Application of ecosystem service flows model in water security assessment: A case study in Weihe River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 120: 106974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106974
LI X, & CHEN Y. Projecting the future impacts of China’s cropland balance policy on ecosystem services under the shared socioeconomic pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 250: 119489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119489
LI X, CHEN H, & LIN K. The Spatial Pattern Strategy of Urban Ecological Patches Based on the Mesoscale WRF-UCM Model: Taking Wuhan City as an Example. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 2022(2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8599257
LI X, GOU X, WANG N, SHENG Y, Jin H, QI Y, SONG X, HOU F, LI Y, ZHAO C, ZOU S, WANG H, ZHENG D, CHEN Y, & NIU X. Tightening ecological management facilitates green development in the Qilian Mountains. Kexue Tongbao/Chinese Science Bulletin, 2019, 64(27): 2928–2937. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2019-0209
LI X, LU F, & DENG G. Matching degree of embodied carbon trade and value-added trade among Chinese provinces (regions). PLoS ONE, 2023, 18(2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277128
LI X, WANG Y, YANG R, ZHANG L, ZHANG Y, LIU Q, & SONG Z. From “blood transfusion” to “hematopoiesis”: watershed eco-compensation in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(33): 49583–49597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20876-w
LI X, YAN Y, & YAO L. ‘Get a Fish’ vs. ‘Get a Fishing Skill’: Farmers’ Preferred Compensation Methods to Control Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(7): 2484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072484
WANG X, LI X, XIN L, TAN M, LI S, & WANG R. Ecological compensation for winter wheat abandonment in groundwater over-exploited areas in the North China Plain. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(10): 1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1338-4
LI Y, CHANG H, DOU Y, & ZHAO X. Willingness and Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Forestland Management in Ethnic Minority Areas: Evidence from Southwest China. Forests, 2023, 14(7): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071377
LI Y, XIANG Z, CHEN K, & WANG X. An improved spatial subsidy approach for ecological compensation in coastal seascapes for resilient land-sea management. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 276: 111305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111305
WANG L, FAYE B, LI Q, & LI Y. A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land in Northeast China. Land, 2023, 12(12): 2179. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12122179
LIU J, & ZHAO W. Cost-sharing of ecological construction based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy cooperative games. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, 13(11): 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111102
LIU J, PEI X, ZHU W, & JIAO J. Simulation of the Ecological Service Value and Ecological Compensation in Arid Area: A Case Study of Ecologically Vulnerable Oasis. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(16): 3927. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15163927
LIU M, & GUO J. Comparisons and improvements of eco-compensation standards for water resource protection in the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. Water Supply, 2020, 20(8): 2988–2999.
LIU Y, & MAO D. Integrated assessment of water quality characteristics and ecological compensation in the Xiangjiang River, south-central China. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 110: 105922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105922
LIU Y, & YUAN L. Study on the influencing factors and profitability of horizontal ecological compensation mechanism in Yellow River Basin of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(37): 87353–87367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28243-z
LIU Y, QIAN Z, KONG H, WU R, ZHENG P, & QIN W. Impacts of Eco-Poverty Alleviation Policies on Farmer Livelihood Changes and Response Mechanisms in a Karst Area of China from a Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2023, 15(3): 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032618
LIU Y, QU B, JIANG E, HAO L, ZHU Y, & JING Y. Allocating payments for ecosystem services under future multiple scenarios in the Yellow River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 157(45). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111232
LIU Y, ZHAO C, LIU X, CHANG Y, WANG H, YANG J, YANG X, & WEI Y. The multi-dimensional perspective of ecological security evaluation and drive mechanism for Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve, China. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 132: 108295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108295
LIU Y-Q, & ZHANG H-B. Discussion on farmers’ willingness to accept compensation for ecological services and its influential factors based on CVM method: A case study in Yancheng rare bird nature reserve. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(11): 982–987.
WANG Y, & LIU Y. Can the Top Management Team’s Environmental Attention Promote Corporate Green Innovation? Sustainability (Switzerland), 2024, 16(8): 3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083495
PAGIOLA S, HONEY-ROSÉS J, & FREIRE-GONZÁLEZ J. Assessing the Permanence of Land-Use Change Induced by Payments for Environmental Services: Evidence from Nicaragua. Tropical Conservation Science, 2020;13. doi:10.1177/1940082920922676
WANG H, WANG X, SARKAR A, & ZHANG F. How capital endowment and ecological cognition affect environment-friendly technology adoption: A case of apple farmers of Shandong province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(14): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147571
ZHANG L. YU H, HAO C, & WANG H. Practice Model and Path of Ecosystem Product Value Realization. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(6): 1407–1416.
WANG J, & ZHANG G. Dynamic Evolution, Regional Differences, and Spatial Spillover Effects of Urban Ecological Welfare Performance in China from the Perspective of Ecological Value. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316271
QIAN Q, ZHANG X-J, WANG J-B, YE H, LI Y-N, & ZHANG Z-J. The Spatio-temporal Pattern of Grazing Pressure in the Three-River Headwaters in Qinghai Province from 2005 to 2017. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1311–1317.
WANG L, LV T, ZHANG X, HU H, & CAI X. Global research trends and gaps in ecological compensation studies from 1990 to 2020: A scientometric review. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2022, 65: 126097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126097
WANG L, ZHANG Y, ZHAO Q, REN C, FU Y, & WANG T. Horizontal CO2 Compensation in the Yangtze River Delta Based on CO2 Footprints and CO2 Emissions Efficiency. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(2): 1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021369
WANG X, & NUPPENAU E A. Modelling payments for ecosystem services for solving future water conflicts at spatial scales: The Okavango River Basin example. Ecological Economics, 2021, 184: 106982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106982
WANG X, WANG Y, PANG Y, WANG K, & YU J. Pollution Load Coordination and Eco-Compensation for Trans-Boundary Water Pollution Control: The Case of the Tri-Border Region of the Yangtze Delta. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2024, 16(3): 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031151
WANG Y, FENG Q, CHEN L, & YU T. Significance and effect of ecological rehabilitation project in inland river basins in Northwest China. Environmental Management, 2013, 52(1): 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0077-x
ZHANG Y, CHEN R, & WANG Y. Tendency of land reclamation in coastal areas of Shanghai from 1998 to 2015. Land Use Policy, 2020, 91: 104370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104370
JIANG K, ZHANG J, ZHANG L, WANG D, & WANG Y. Sustainable cooperation in the watershed ecological compensation public-private partnership project: Lessons from China’s Chishui river basin. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2023, 90: 101730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101730
ZHANG H, ZHU D L, & ZHANG Y. Natural capital accounting of cultivated land based on three-dimensional ecological footprint model - A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 10: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1060527
REN Y, LU L, ZHANG H, CHEN H, & ZHU D. Residents’ willingness to pay for ecosystem services and its influencing factors: A study of the Xin’an River basin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 268: 122301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122301
ZHANG J, BROWN C, QIAO G, & ZHANG B. Effect of Eco-compensation Schemes on Household Income Structures and Herder Satisfaction: Lessons from the Grassland Ecosystem Subsidy and Award Scheme in Inner Mongolia. Ecological Economics, 2019, 159: 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.006
ZHANG J, SUN J, LI W, & ZHANG Y. Research on Implementation Effectiveness of Command-and-Control Environmental Regulations: Evidence from the Basin Ecological Compensation Policy of China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2023, 59(8): 2577–2599. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2186174
ZHANG J, & ZHANG D. Study on the fundraising of horizontal ecological compensation under efficiency and fairness: a case study of the Yellow River Basin in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(30): 74862–74876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27656-0
ZHANG J, ZOU J, & ZHANG K. A comprehensive model of basin ecological compensation funds—A case study of the Yellow River Basin in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, 11: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1119576
ZHANG X. Quick aboveground carbon stock estimation of densely planted shrubs by using point cloud derived from unmanned aerial vehicle. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242914
ZHANG Y, HE D, LU Y, & FENG Y. The influence of large dams building on resettlement in the Upper Mekong River. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2013, 23(5): 947–957. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1054-2
ZHANG Y, & ZHANG D. Efficiency Measurement and Influencing Factors of Ecological Compensation: A Case Study from Wuqi and Zhidan on the Loess Plateau. Natural Resources Research, 2021, 30(6): 4905–4921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09947-w
ZHANG Y, ULGIATI S, DONG X, & PFAHLER D. Using ecological criteria to develop CDM projects in Zhifanggou Valley, Loess Plateau, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 141(3–4): 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.005
ZHU K, ZHANG Y, WANG M, & LIU H. The Ecological Compensation Mechanism in a Cross-Regional Water Diversion Project Using Evolutionary Game Theory: The Case of the Hanjiang River Basin, China. Water (Switzerland), 2022, 14(7): 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071151
ALEXANDER J, & RAMÍREZ F. EDITORIAL. 11–13, 2017.
PARDO NUÑEZ I D, & ROZO SAMUEL J. I. Instrumentos de valoración para los servicios ecositémicos. Universidad De Cundinamarca, 2018.
CHITARO DI LORENZO S. Mapeo De Servicios Ecosistemicos Como Herramienta Para El Ordenamiento Territorial De Un Área De Protección Ambinetal Del Departament De Canelones. Thesis, Universidad de la República, 2020.
MEJÍA GIRALDO L M. Análisis Estadístico de sistemas ecológicos. En Universidad La Gran Colombia, 2009. https://www.ugc.edu.co/sede/armenia/files/editorial/analisis_estadistico_de_sistemas_ecologicos.pdf
JAMES F C, & MCCULLOCH C E. Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora’s box? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1990, 21(1): 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.001021
GUERRERO S C. Una metodología para el tratamiento de la multicolinealidad a través del escalamiento multidimensional. Ciencia en Desarrollo, 2017, 8(2): 9–24. https://doi.org/10.19053/01217488.v8.n2.2017.5239
CASTRO VILLARES JJ, MONTES ESCOBAR K, & SALAS-MACIAS CA. Multivariate methods applied to forest ecology in dry forest. Minerva, 2022, 1(3): 131-137. https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v1iSpecial.88.
MASEYK F J F, BAREA L P, STEPHENS R T T, POSSINGHAM H P, DUTSON G, & MARON M. A disaggregated biodiversity offset accounting model to improve estimation of ecological equivalency and no net loss. Biological Conservation, 2016, 204: 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.016
LIU H, LIU S, WANG F, ZHAO Y, & DONG Y. How to synergize ecological restoration to co-benefit the beneficial contributions of nature to people on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau? Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 348: 119267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119267
SHUQIN L, JUQIN S, YURONG W, XIN H, & FUHUA S. An integrated accounting system of the economic-social-ecological framework for assessing the value of intensive land use: A case study of the Taihu Lake governance project. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 158: 111506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111506
JIN P, MENG Z, YAN K, CHEN B, & ZHANG B. Ecological accounting of the Chinese society 2012–2020 based on extended exergy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 417: 137929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137929
YU N, SUN R, & YANG S. Multi-dimensional factor coupling-driven mechanism of spatio-temporal evolution of energy ecological footprint: Evidence from China. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 159: 111701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111701
GUAN M, JIANG Y, DU, W, CAO P, WANG Z, & LEI J. A modified ecological footprint calculation method for drylands and its application to Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 419: 138176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138176
ACOSTA, A. Buen Vivir. Sumak Kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Barcelona: Icaria, 2013.
AMARANTE V, & COLACCE M. More unequal or less? A review of global, regional and national income inequality. CEPAL Review, 2018, 124: 7-31. https://doi.org/10.18356/7c796646-en.
LI P, ZHANG R, WEI H, & XU L. Assessment of physical quantity and value of natural capital in China since the 21st century based on a modified ecological footprint model. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 806: 150676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150676
VIGLIZZO E, CARREÑO L, VOLANTE J, & MOSCIARO J. Valuación de bienes y servicios ecosistémicos: ¿verdad objetiva o cuento de la buena pipa. In LATERRA P, JOBBAGY E, & PARUELO J M (Eds.) Valoración De Servicios Ecosistémicos: Conceptos, Herramientas Y Aplicaciones Para El Ordenamiento Territorial, chapter 1, 17-36. Ediciones INTA, 2011.
JIANG S, FENG F, ZHANG X, XU C, JIA B, & LAFORTEZZA R. Ecological transformation is the key to improve ecosystem health for resource-exhausted cities: A case study in China based on future development scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 921: 171147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171147
LI F, WANG F, LIU H, HUANG K, YU Y, & HUANG B. A comparative analysis of ecosystem service valuation methods: Taking Beijing, China as a case. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110872
VENCES-MACEDO L, DÍAS J, CHÁVEZ R, & BRAVO M. La huella ecológica aplicada al análisis del ciclo de vida, corporaciones y ciudades: una revisión sistemática. Innovar: Revista de ciencias administrativas y sociales 2024, 34(91): 1–26. https://doi.org/1015446/innovar.v34n91.101009
YE R, HUANG Z, LI L, & SHAN X. GeoUNet: A novel AI model for high-resolution mapping of ecological footprint. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2022, 112: 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102803
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
