Unlocking Creativity and Engagement in Students through Project-Based Learning
Abstract
This pioneering study investigates the unique application of project-based learning (PjBL) to enhance creative writing skills under the Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) initiative. It addresses a critical gap in understanding PjBL’s impact on creative writing, student learning outcomes, and teaching methodologies. The novelty of this research lies in its exclusive focus on PjBL within the creative writing realm under MBKM, offering unparalleled insights into the synergy between technology, individualized teaching methodologies, and creative processes. Consequently, it contributes significantly to expanding the knowledge domain of experiential learning. The primary objective is to identify key factors that contribute to the success of PjBL and comprehend its transformative role in academia. To achieve this, a qualitative approach involving technical instruments such as interviews and case studies with university lecturers is employed. The results, gleaned from an in-depth analysis of data from three lecturers, reveal that PjBL considerably bolsters students’ creative expression and problem-solving capabilities, while facilitating educators in devising more flexible, innovative teaching strategies. Finally, this study underscores PjBL’s seminal role in nurturing an interactive learning environment that stimulates independent and creative thinking. It strongly advocates a wider exploration of PjBL applications across diverse disciplines and endorses policy reforms for its effective integration into curricula. The research also highlights the need for evolving PjBL methodologies to stay abreast of technological advancements and shifting educational needs, thereby offering readers a comprehensive understanding of the research work undertaken.
Keywords: project-based learning, creative writing education, educators' experiences, students' learning enhancement.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
MAKRI A., VLACHOPOULOS D., and MARTINA R. A. Digital Escape Rooms as Innovative Pedagogical Tools in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 2021, 13(8): 4587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084587
FERRI F., GRIFONI P., and GUZZO T. Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations. Societies, 2020, 10(4): 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
NINGSIH S. R., DISMAN D., AHMAN E., SUWATNO S., and RISWANTO A. Effectiveness of Using the Project-Based Learning Model in Improving Creative-Thinking Ability. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2020, 8(4): 1628–1635. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080456
SUWARNO S., WAHIDIN W., and NUR S. H. Project-based learning model assisted by worksheet: It’s effect on students’ creativity and learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 2020, 6(1): 113-122. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10619
ZEN Z., REFLIANTO, SYAMSUAR, and ARIANI F. Academic achievement: the effect of project-based online learning method and student engagement. Heliyon, 2022, 8(11): e11509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11509
YANG H. H., LI R. C., CHEUNG S. K. S., and KWOK L. F. Unleashing the Potentials of Flexible Education with Pedagogical and Technological Innovations. Sustainability, 2023, 15(20): 14915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014915
WILSON K. Exploring the challenges and enablers of implementing a STEM project-based learning programme in a diverse junior secondary context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2021, 19(5): 881-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8
SUKACKĖ V., DE CARVALHO GUERRA A. O. P., ELLINGER D., CARLOS V., PETRONIENĖ S., GAIŽIŪNIENĖ L., BLANCH S., MARBÀ-TALLADA A., and BROSE A. Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability, 2022, 14(21): 13955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955
HAKIMAH N. Assessing the Impact of Project-Based Learning on Students’ Writing Skills: A Pre-Experimental Study. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 2023, 5(2): 434-448. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v5i2.3723
SANTOS R., & BAE J. B. T-Shaped graduates: Developing cognitive and metacognitive (socioemotional) skills in a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics-aligned course using project-based approach in an online learning environment. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 2022, 11(14): 91-105. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2022.b021
PENTURY H. J., ANGGRAENI A. D., and PRATAMA D. Improving Students’ 21st Century Skills through Creative Writing as a Creative Media. Deiksis, 2020, 12(2): 164-178. https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v12i02.5184
MANTRA I. B. N., HANDAYANI N. D., PRAMAWATI A. A. I. Y., and WIDIASTUTI I. A. M. S. Brainstorming Combined with Project-Based Learning as an Effective Learning Strategy in Writing Classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2023, 14(6): 1590-1596. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.17
HEILPORN G., LAKHAL S., and BÉLISLE M. An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2021, 18: 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
GONZÁLEZ-PÉREZ L. I., & RAMÍREZ-MONTOYA M. S. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 2022, 14(3): 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
PETERSEN C., & NASSAJI H. Project-based learning through the eyes of teachers and students in adult ESL classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 2016, 72(1): 13-39. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2096
MEIROVITZ T., RUSSAK S., and ZUR A. English as a foreign language teachers’ perceptions regarding their pedagogical-technological knowledge and its implementation in distance learning during COVID-19. Heliyon, 2022, 8(4): e09175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09175
PAN G., SHANKARARAMAN V., KOH K., and GAN S. Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process. The International Journal of Management Education, 2021, 19(2): 100501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100501
BRAUN V., CLARKE V., BOULTON E., DAVEY L., and MCEVOY C. The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2021, 24(6): 641-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
HEFLIN H., SHEWMAKER J., and NGUYEN J. Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 2017, 107: 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
BRAUN V., & CLARKE V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2021, 18(3): 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
HAYS D. G., & MCKIBBEN W. B. Promoting rigorous research: Generalizability and qualitative research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 2021, 99(2): 178-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12365
LIU B., PAVLOU P. A., and CHENG X. Achieving a balance between privacy protection and data collection: A field experimental examination of a theory-driven information technology solution. Information Systems Research, 2022, 33(1): 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1045
DENNIS S. A., GOODSON B. M., and PEARSON C. A. Online worker fraud and evolving threats to the integrity of MTurk data: A discussion of virtual private servers and the limitations of IP-based screening procedures. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2020, 32(1): 119-134. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-18-044
LOCKYER B., ISLAM S., RAHMAN A., DICKERSON J., PICKETT K., SHELDON T., WRIGHT J., MCEACHAN R., SHEARD L., and THE BRADFORD INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH RESEARCH COVID‐19 SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY GROUP. Understanding COVID‐19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Health Expectations, 2021, 24(4): 1158-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13240
RAHMAN M. S. The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language "Testing and Assessment" Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 2016, 6(1): 102-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
KENNEDY R., CLIFFORD S., BURLEIGH T., WAGGONER P. D., JEWELL R., and WINTER N. J. The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis. Political Science Research and Methods, 2020, 8(4): 614-629. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.6
BRAUN V., & CLARKE V. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2021, 21(1): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
SHIM T. E., & LEE S. Y. College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19. Children and Youth Services Review, 2020, 119: 105578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105578
ASAD Z., & JAVED D. F. Exploring the effectiveness of in-service training programs for enhancing teaching skills of ESL teachers at higher education level: teachers’ perceptions and experiences. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 2023, 10(1): 198-207. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass.v10i1.367
ZAHORODNIA L., MELNYK I., CHEPIL M., KARPENKO O., MARIEIEVA T., and KARNAUKHOVA A. Crisis Challenges in Societal Development and the Peculiarities of Preparing Preschool Education Specialists in These Conditions. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 2023, 17(5): e03389. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n5-001
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
