Students’ Critical Thinking Abilities Based on Cognitive Style in STEM-Integrated Problem-Based Learning
Abstract
This research aims to determine students’ cognitive styles in STEM-integrated problem-based learning and differences in students’ critical thinking abilities based on field-independent and field-dependent cognitive styles. The novelty of this research lies in integrating STEM in problem-based learning as a context for analyzing students’ critical thinking abilities based on their cognitive style. This research is descriptive and qualitative. The research subjects were selected using a purposive sampling technique, consisting of SMA Negeri 8 Semarang class X students. The results of this research are as follows: (1) There are 15 field-independent cognitive style students with the following characteristics: high curiosity, liking individual assignments, independent and structured learning, and a highly competitive spirit. There are 21 field-dependent cognitive style students with the following characteristics: lack of curiosity, likes group assignments, depend on teachers, and a lack of competitive spirit. (2) Strong field-independent students have medium and high levels of thinking. They can master all aspects very well. Weak field-independent students have medium and high levels of thinking. They can master the evaluation aspect very well and other aspects well. Strong field-dependent students have low and medium levels of thinking. They can master the analysis and evaluation aspects very well, the inference aspects well, and are less able to master the interpretation aspects. Weak field-dependent students have low and medium levels of thinking. They can master the analysis and interpretation aspects well, but they cannot master the evaluation and inference aspects.
Keywords: cognitive style, critical thinking ability, problem-based learning, STEM.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AGOESTANTO A., & SUKESTIYARNO Y. L. Analysis of mathematics critical thinking students in junior high school based on cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, 824(1): 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012052
ARIGAWATI N. H., & KUSNANDI K. Berpikir Kritis Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender dan Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Field Independent. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 2023, 6(8): 6125-6133. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i8.2408
ASYARI M., AL MUHDHAR M. H. I., SUSILO H., and IBROHIM I. Improving critical thinking skills through the integration of problem based learning and group investigation. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2016, 5(1): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2014-0042
DESIMA. Psychology of Student Development. PT. Rosdakarya Teenager, 2009.
FACIONE P. A. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 2013. https://insightassessment.com/iaresource/critical-thinking-what-it-is-and-why-it-counts/
FEBRIYANTI C. The Influence of Feedback Form and Cognitive Style on Trigonometry Learning Outcomes. Formative Journal, 2015, 3(3): 203–214.
GUISANDE M. A., PÁRAMO M. F., TINAJERO C., and ALMEIDA L. S. Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psychothema, 2007, 19(4): 572–577.
HARDIYANTI A. H., T A. Y., and SAYU S. Critical Thinking Ability Viewed from Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Triangular and Quadrilateral Material. Equatorial Journal of Education and Learning, 2019, 8(12): 1–10.
JOHNSON E. Contextual Teaching and Learning. Mizan Main Media, 2007.
NGILAWAJAN D. A. Proses Berpikir Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Materi Turunan Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2013, 2(1): 71-83. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v2i1.48
NUR S., PUJIASTUTI I. P., and RAHMAN S. R. Efektivitas Model Problem Based Learning (Pbl) terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Sulawesi Barat. SAINTIFIK, 2016, 2(2): 133-141. https://doi.org/10.31605/saintifik.v2i2.105
O'BRIEN T. P., BUTLER S. M., and BERNOLD L. E. Group Embedded Figures Test and Academic Achievement in Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2001, 17(1): 89–92. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol17-1/IJEE1178.pdf
PAUL R., & ELDER L. Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional & Personal Life. Pearson Education, 2013.
QUANG L. X., HOANG L. H., CHUAN V. D., and NAM N. H. Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education through Active Experience of Designing Technical Toys in Vietnamese Schools. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioral Science, 2015, 11(2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/19429
RIFQIYANA L., MASRUKAN M., and SUSILO B. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VIII Dengan Pembelajaran Model 4K Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 2016, 5(1): 40-46. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v5i1.8608
ROKHMAWATI J. D., DJATMIKA E. T., and WARDANA L. Implementation of problem based learning model to improve students’ problem solving skill and self-efficacy (A study on IX class students of SMP Muhammadiyah). IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2016, 6(3): 51–55.
WARDHANI N. K., RASIMAN, and WULANDARI D. Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Solving Mathematical Problems in View of Cognitive Style. Imaginary: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2021, 3(1): 1–6.
WIDIAWATI L., JOYOATMOJO S., and SUDIYANTO. Higher Order Thinking Skills as Effect of Problem Based Learning in the 21st Century Learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 2018, 5(3): 96–105. https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/223
WITKIN H. A., MOORE C. A., GOODENOUGH D., and COX P. W. Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47(1): 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001
WULAN E. R., & ANGGRAINI R. E. Gaya Kognitif Field-Dependent dan Field-Independent sebagai Jendela Profil Pemecahan Masalah Polya dari Siswa SMP. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 2019, 1(2): 123–142. https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v1i2.1503
WULANDARI M., & SETIAWAN W. Analisis Kesulitan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Barisan Pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 2021, 4(3): 571–578. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i3.p%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.