Critical Reading Teaching Materials Show R-Tam-Based Malay Teaching Loaded with Humanist Literacy: Future Language Learning Innovations

Asnawi, Ida Zulaeha, Teguh Supriyanto, Hari Bakti Mardikantoro, Sri Wahyuni

Abstract

Critical reading teaching materials need to be innovated to fit the demands of future language learning. Critical reading learning needs to be combined with local cultural components to make teaching materials contextual. Therefore, it is necessary to play the role of Tunjuk Ajar Melayu (TAM, Show Malay Teaching), designed with humanist literacy-laden R-TAM using an online learning platform to create learning that suits the demands of future language learning. TAM is the principle of Malay community life in Riau. The principles of Malay society have shifted their role in today’s life. This problem is the basis of socialization through learning to future generations in an effort to anticipate the loss of Malay principles of life. This research was conducted in Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia, with the research subjects of lecturers and students of Indonesian Language Education. Data collection methods included observation, questionnaire, and interview. Data were processed using reflective analysis with the help of AntCon and Tag Crowd. The researchers described that the characteristics of future critical reading teaching materials require innovation with the content of R-TAM-based technology, which contains humanist literacy using critical psycho-didactic approaches, and TAM.

 

 

Keywords: critical reading, Tunjuk Ajar Melayu, R-TAM.

 

 

 


Full Text:

PDF


References


WIJAYANTI, W., ZULAEHA, I., & RUSTONO, R. (2015). Development of Interactive Teaching Materials Competency Producing Complex Procedure Texts Containing Modesty for Students of Class X SMA/MA. Seloka: Indonesian Journal of Language and Literature Education, 4(2): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.15294/SELOKA.V4I2.9866

MCIHUA LIU. (2013). Blended Learning in a University EFL Writing Course; Description and Evaluation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2): 301–309. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.2.301-309

LOSCHERT, K. (2018). Blending Teaching and Technology: Simple Strategies for Improved Student Learning (1st ed., Issue February). America: The Alliance for Excellent Education.

IDRIS, M., & ZULAEHA, I. (2017). Effectiveness of Enrichment Book Writing Text Observation Results Multicultural Based on Reading Project Write for Junior High School Students. Seloka: Indonesian Journal of Language and Literature Education, 6(73): 187–199.

GHAZIZADEH, T., & FATEMIPOUR, H. (2017). The Effect of Blended Learning on EFL Learners’ Reading Proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3): 606. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.21

SYAMSI, K., SARI, E. S., & PUJIONO, S. (2013). Development of Reading Textbook Model Based on Process Approach for Junior High School Students. Journal of the Horizons of Education, 32(1): 82–90. https://doi.org/http://doi.10.21831/cp.v5i1.1262

SUDIATI, & NURHIDAYAH. (2017). Development of Teaching Materials to Read Understanding Based on PLAN Strategy. Journal of THE LITERA, 16(1): 114–128. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v16i1.14255

MELIAWATI KOMANG, NITIASIH, P.K., BUDASI, I. G. (2014). Developing Blended Learning Based Reading Materials for The Tenth Grade Multimedia Students of SMK Wira Harapan. E-Journal Graduate Program Ganesha University of Education English Language Education Study Program, 2: 1–11.

ZHANG, L. (2018). Effects of Metacognitive and Cognitive Strategy Use on Reading Test Performance. In: Metacognitive and Cognitive Strategy Use in Reading Comprehension. Springer, Singapore, pp. 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6325-1_5

PEAKE, C., JIMÉNEZ, J. E., RODRÍGUEZ, C., BISSCHOP, E., &VILLARROEL, R. (2015). Syntactic Awareness and Arithmetic Word Problem Solving in Children with and without Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(6), 593 –601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413520183

SULTAN. (2018). Critical Reading: Uncovering Text Ideology with a Critical Literacy Approach. Yogyakarta: Baskara Media.

PRIYATNI, E. (2014). Development of Critical Reading Teaching Materials based on Responsive Interventions. Litera Journal, 13(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v13i1.1900

LESTARI, I. (2013). Competency Based Teaching Materials Development. Padang: Academia.

HIRATA, Y. (2018). E-learning Courseware for Language Education in Japan: Its Application and Student Perceptions. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(2): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1454833

SUTTON, P. S., & SHOUSE, A. W. (2018). Investigating the Role of Social Status in Teacher Collaborative Groups. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(4): 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117751125

MACKEY, T. P. (2008). Exploring The Relationships Between Web Usability and Students’ Perceived Learning in Web-Based Multimedia (WBMM) Tutorials. Journal Computers & Education, 50(8): 386–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.006

BSNP. (2017). Standard Teaching Book and Teaching Module. Jakarta: Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Directorate General of Learning and Student Affairs, Directorate of Learning.

RISMAYANTI, A. (2013). Get to Know Edmodo More: As an E-Learning and Collaboration Medium. Jakarta: Online Book.

PRASTOWO, A. (2012). Creative Guide to Creating Innovative Teaching Materials. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

WIDODO, & JASMADI. (2008). Guide to Preparing Competency-Based Teaching Materials. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

PRASTOWO, A. (2013). Thematic Teaching Material Development: A Complete Guide to Applicatives. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

SCHECHTER, R., MACARUSO, P., KAZAKOFF, E. R., BROOKE, E. (2015). Exploration of a Blended Learning Approach to Reading Instruction for Low SES Students in Early Elementary Grades. Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 0569 (February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2015.1100652

SHANNON, L.C., STYERS, M. K., BAIRD, S., & PEERY, E. (2015). Computers in the Schools: A Randomized Control Trial. Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 32(1): 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2014.969159

ISRAEL, S. E., & DUFFY, G. G. (2011). Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. New York: Madison Ave.

ANDERSON, M., & ANDERSON, K. (2003). Text Types in English 2. South Yarra: Macmillian Education Australia.

NURHADI. (2009). Reading Techniques. Malang: Publisher A3.

NURHADI. (2010). Quick and Effective Reading. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

EFFENDY, T. (2013). Show Malay Teaching in Pantun, Gurindam, Seloka, Syair and Ungkapan. Pekanbaru: Malay Studies.

PANOV, V., & PLAKSINA, I. (2019). Psycho-didactic Conditions for the Agency Development in the Educational and Professional Activities of Students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 356(2): 457–463.

ČERNÁ, M. (2018). Psychodidactic Approach in the Development of Language Competences in University Students within Blended Learning Concept. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 0513, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1454834

STADLEROV, H. (2015). The Development of Psycho-Didactic Skills within Special Art Education Projects. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 4(2): 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2015-0006

PETROVÁ, G., & KOZÁROVÁ, N. (2017). Teaching foreign language to adults from the aspects of psychodidactic conception of education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 5(2): 103–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/jolace-2017-0021

PANOV, V., & PLAKSINA, I. (2017). Didactic and Psychodidactic Features of Forming Universal Learning Action Subject. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 144(3): 546–550.

BECK, A. (2005). Critical Literacy in the Classroom. Thinking Classroom, 6(3): 3–9.

CERVETTI, G., PARDALES, M. J., & DAMICO, J. S. (2010). A Tale of Differences: Comparing the Traditional, Perspectives, and Educational Goals of Critical Reading and Critical Literacy. Reading Online, 1(1). http://www.readingonline.org/articles/Cervetti

DERBALI, C., ELLOUMI, A., & MATOUSSI, F. (2017). The Need to Learn According to Psycho-Didactic Approach: Self-Determination and Student’s Performance in Physical Education Realm. Creative Education, 8: 1155–1171. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.87083

MIKLOŠÍKOVÁ, M. (2012). Self-Reflection and Psycho-Didactic Competence of a University Teacher of Technical Subjects. Problemy Profesjologii, Polskie Towarzystwo Profesjologiczne, 2: 47-53.

LYNCH, D., FRADALE, P., SELL, K., TURNER, D., 和 YEIGH, T. (2018). Towards an Effective Model for Whole of School Blended Learning: A conceptual paper. In International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 4(1): 29-51. www.ijicc.net www.ijicc.net

DRISCOLL, M. (2002). Blended Learning: Let’s Get Beyond the Hype. IBM Global Services Consultants.

THORNE, K. (2012). Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online and Traditional Learning (1st ed.). London, United States: Kogan Page Limited, British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A. www.kogan-page.co.uk

YEH, Y.-C. (2010). Integrating collaborative PBL with blended learning to explore preservice teachers’ development of online learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8): 1630–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.014

KÖNINGS, K. D., de JONG, N., LOHRMANN, C., SUMSKAS, L., et al. (2018). Is Blended Learning and Problem-Based Learning Course Design Suited to Develop Future Public Health Leaders: An Explorative European Study. Public Health Reviews, 39(13). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0090-y

SUGIYONO. (2012). Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.