Financial Statement Fraud Prevention Strategy: Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the factors that cause financial statement fraud. This study uses the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and determines the appropriate model strategy for preventing financial statement fraud at State-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia. The mixed method is applied in this work as this research also uses the descriptive analysis method to analyze the phenomena that occur. The informants in this study were members of the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution (BPK) and State Development Audit Agency (BPKP), academics, and financial managers of enterprises SOEs in Indonesia. This study formulated the following fraud prevention strategies in the context of SOEs fraud: (1) Practicing honest culture and high ethics, (2) improving supervision and control systems, (3) formulating anti-fraud values, (4) implementing a firm-wide reward and punishment system, (5) introducing anti-fraud socialization for employees, and (6) establishing change agents.
Keywords: financial statement fraud, fuzzy analytical hierarchy, fraud.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
SAATY T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1(1): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED FRAUD EXAMINERS. Report to the Nations 2018 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, 2018. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/acfepublic/2018-report-to-the-nations.pdf
BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA, 2020. https://www.bpk.go.id/
INDONESIAN CORRUPTION WATCH. The Trend of Corruption Cases in 2017. Jakarta, 2017.
CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX. Berlin: Transparency International, 2018.
SAATY T. L. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1993.
CRESSEY D. R. Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1953.
JENSEN M. C., & MECKLING W. H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3: 305–360. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
WOLFE D. T., & HERMANSON D. R. The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 2004, 74(12): 38–42. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2546&context=facpubs
CROWE H. Why the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough. Horwath, Crowe LLP, 2011.
WAHYUNI S., & HARTATI S. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Model Fuzzy AHP Dalam Pemilihan Kualitas Perdagangan Batu Mulia. Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems, 2013, 6(1): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.2140
TUNGGAL A. W. The fraud Audit Mencegah dan Mendeteksi Kecurangan Akuntansi. Harvarindo, Jakarta, 2012.
KARYONO. Forensic Fraud. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2013.
SAPUTRA F. P., HIDAYAT N., and FURQON M. T. Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) Untuk Menentukan Besar Pinjaman Pada Koperasi. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 2018, 2(4): 1761–1767. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/1352
MANGLA S. K., KUMAR P., and BARUA M. K. Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, 104: 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.001
ADNYANA T. G. A. F., GANDHIADI G. K., and NILAKUSMAWATI D. P. E. Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Ahp Dalam Penentuan Sektor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Perekonomian Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal Matematika, 2016, 5(2): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.24843/MTK.2016.v05.i02.p122
KURNIASARI N. T., FARIYANTI A., and RISTIYANTO N. Strategi Pencegahan Kecurangan (Fraud) Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Pemerintah Menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Manajemen Pembangunan Daerah, 2019, 9(2): 39-48. https://doi.org/10.29244/jurnal_mpd.v9i2.27633
RISTIANINGSIH I. Telaah Konsep Fraud Diamond Theory Dalam Mendeteksi Perilaku Fraud di Perguruan Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call For Paper Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2017, pp. 128–139.
KAKATI S., & GOSWAMI C. Factors and Motivation of Fraud in The Corporate Sector: A Literature Review. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 2019, 8(3): 86-96. http://publishingindia.com/jcar/47/factors-and-motivation-of-fraud-in-the-corporate-sector-a-literature-review/812/5654/
GHOZALI I., ACHMAD T., and PAMUNGKAS I. D. Determinants of Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Whistleblowing System: Applying Theory of Planned Behavior. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 2019, 16: 393-402. https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/economics/2019/a825107-737.php
WIRANTA D. N. S. Transformasi Birokrasi: Cara untuk Penguatan Etika dan Integritas dalam Pencegahan Korupsi. Jurnal Lingkar Widyaiswara, 2015, 2(4): 44–71. http://juliwi.com/published/E0204/Juliwi0204_44-71.pdf
WAHYUDI S., ACHMAD T., and PAMUNGKAS I. D. Whistleblowing System and Fraud Early Warning System on Village Fund Fraud: The Indonesian Experience. International Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 10(6): 211-217.
ALBRECHT W. S., & ALBRECHT C. O. Fraud Examination & Prevention. Mason, Ohio, Thomson/South-Western, 2004.
SIAHAAN M., UMAR H., and PURBA R. B. Fraud Star Drives to Asset Misappropriation Moderated by Internal Controls. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.4.24
ANSHORI M. Y., HERLAMBANG T., and RAHMALIA D. Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) on Constrained Pairings Selection from Flight Schedule. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law and Pedagogy, Sidoarjo, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-2-2019.2286496
INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS. International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) 2013 Edition. Practice Advisories. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Lake Mary, Florida, 2012.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.