Digital Inequality and Development: Using Short Message Service for Agricultural Development in Indonesia
Abstract
Technology tends to have positive and negative impacts on the community. In agricultural development, information and communication technology (ICT) is deemed able to provide agricultural knowledge and practices to increase farmers' welfare. However, at the same time, there is a notion that ICT can also cause inequality among farmers. This research aims to study whether or not short message service is beneficial for farmers and whether or not it creates inequality in an agricultural society. The research is by way of surveys conducted among 200 farmers in West Java, Indonesia. This research shows that SMS can increase farmers’ knowledge in farming. The most important result, as a novelty, is that the research proves that the digital divide and digital inequality take place in the use of SMS for agricultural development.
Keywords: digital inequality, information and communication technology, rural development, short message service.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
SERVAES J. Handbook of communication for development and social change. Springer, Singapore, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2014-3
BURRELL J. Thinking relationally about digital inequality in rural regions of the U.S. First Monday, 2018, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i6.8376
HERNANDEZ K., & ROBERTS T. Leaving No One Behind in a Digital World, 2018. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/14147/Emerging%20Issues_LNOBDW_final.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
GAZIANO C. Knowledge Gap: History and Development. In: ROESSLER P., HOFFNER C. A., and VAN ZOONEN L. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. Wiley-Blackwell, 2017: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0041
BONFADELLI H. Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge. In: POTTHOFF M. (ed.) Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung. Springer, Wiesbaden, 2016: 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_10
LUCENDO-MONEDERO A. L., RUIZ-RODRÍGUEZ F., and GONZÁLEZ-RELAÑO R. Measuring the digital divide at regional level. A spatial analysis of the inequalities in digital development of households and individuals in Europe. Telematics and Informatics, 2019, 41: 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.05.002
HARGITTAI E., PIPER A. M., and MORRIS M. R. From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2019, 18(4): 881–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5
VAN DIJK J. The Digital Divide. Polity Press, Cambridge, Medford, 2020.
RAGNEDDA M. The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. Taylor and Francis, 2017.
WORLD BANK. ICT in Agriculture (Updated Edition): Connecting Smallholders to Knowledge, Networks, and Institutions. World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, 2017. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/27526
PARK S. Digital inequalities in rural Australia: A double jeopardy of remoteness and social exclusion. Journal of Rural Studies, 2017, 54: 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.018
CAMACHO A., & CONOVER E. The impact of receiving SMS price and weather information on small scale farmers in Colombia. World Development, 2019, 123: 104596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.020
OMULO G., & KUMEH E. M. Farmer-to-farmer digital network as a strategy to strengthen agricultural performance in Kenya: A research note on ‘Wefarm’ platform. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 158: 120120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120120
LEE H., & LEE, S.-H. A Study on Digital Divide of Farmers and Fishermen. Journal of Digital Convergence, 2018, 16(1): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.1.013
BUCKLAND S. F., & CAMPBELL D. An assessment of factors influencing awareness, access and use of agro-climate services among farmers in Clarendon, Jamaica. Geoforum, 2020, 126: 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.032
RAUNGPAKA V., & SAVETPANUVONG P. Information orientation of small-scale farmers’ community enterprises in Northern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 2017, 38(3): 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.018
SHARMA U., CHETRI P., MINOCHA S., ROY A., HOLKER T., PATT A., and JOERIN J. Do phone-based short message services improve the uptake of agri-met advice by farmers? A case study in Haryana, India. Climate Risk Management, 2021, 33: 100321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100321
SIKUNDLA T., MUSHUNJE A., and AKINYEMI B. E. Socioeconomic drivers of mobile phone adoption for marketing among smallholder irrigation farmers in South Africa. Cogent Social Sciences, 2018, 4(1): 1505415. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1505415
BEZA E., REIDSMA P., POORTVLIET P. M., BELAY M. M., BIJEN B. S., and KOOISTRA L. Exploring farmers’ intentions to adopt mobile Short Message Service (SMS) for citizen science in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 151: 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.015
KLERKX L., JAKKU E., and LABARTHE P. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 2019, 90–91: 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315
NARINE L. K., HARDER A., and ROBERTS T. G. Farmers’ intention to use text messaging for extension services in Trinidad. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2019, 25(4): 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2019.1629970
SILVESTRI S., RICHARD M., EDWARD B., DHARMESH G., and DANNIE R. Going digital in agriculture: how radio and SMS can scale-up smallholder participation in legume-based sustainable agricultural intensification practices and technologies in Tanzania. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2021, 19(5-6): 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1750796
LAEEQ KHAN M., WELSER H. T., CISNEROS C., MANATONG G., and IDRIS I. K. Digital inequality in the Appalachian Ohio: Understanding how demographics, internet access, and skills can shape vital information use (VIU). Telematics and Informatics, 2020, 50: 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101380
ROGERS E. M. (ed.) Communication and development: Critical perspectives. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1976.
NYAWO J. C., & MUBANGIZI B. C. Perception of Agricultural Smallholder Farmers on Public Extension and Advisory Services in Ethekwini Municipality, Kwazulu-Natal Province. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(3): 499-518. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.3.42
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.