The Whole Nine Yards of Safety Climate Research
The idea of safety climate is known for its complexity, as the notion of safety climate itself is perplexing through its content, dimensions, and application in different disciplines. The prime motive of this research is to apply bibliometric analysis to the safety climate research construct, ascertain the pivotal influences and elaborate a structure, characteristics and progresses made for the last 16 years. Application of this statistical technique for safety climate research construct is essential to understand the overall research patterns, as no such analysis can be found to date addressing the vast amount of data that we have utilized. In doing so, a total of 2,027 publications from 2005 to 2021 on safety climate were identified through the Web of Science. These 2,027 publications cover 5,723 authors, 686 research journals, 90 countries or territories, and 2,092 organizations and institutions. The main research areas associated with safety climate were healthcare, patient safety climate, psychological climate, and organizational safety climate. Contemporarily, food safety climate and food safety culture are also associated with safety climate. Historical application of safety climate in high-reliable industries provides a rationale to be utilized in other occupational settings. Prominent journals, publications, and authors from the last decade are also identified. Geographically, the USA, Australia, UK, and Canada are the most contributing countries for safety climate research. More collaboration on safety climate research is needed. Presently concentration in this research domain is found in certain countries, which creates geographical inequality in the publication in the purview of safety.
Keywords: bibliometric analysis, safety climate, organizational safety climate, safety performance, safety culture, health-care.
RODRIGUES S. P., VAN ECK N. J., WALTMAN L., and JANSEN F. W. Mapping patient safety: a large-scale literature review using bibliometric visualisation techniques. BMJ Open, 2014, 4( 3): e004468, https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004468.
ZHOU Z., GOH Y. M., and LI Q. Overview and analysis of safety management studies in the construction industry. Safety Science, 72: 337–350, 2015, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.10.006.
JIA X., DAI T., and GUO X. Comprehensive exploration of urban health by bibliometric analysis: 35 years and 11,299 articles’, Scientometrics, 2014, 99(3): 881–894, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-013-1220-4.
LI J. and HALE A. Output distributions and topic maps of safety related journals. Safety Science, 2016, 82: 236–244, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.004.
LI W. and ZHAO Y. Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2015, 50: 158–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.012.
WANG B., PAN S.-Y., KE R.-Y. et al. An overview of climate change vulnerability: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Natural Hazards, 2014, 74(3): 1649–1666, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1260-y.
HÅVOLD J. I. and NESSET E. From safety culture to safety orientation: Validation and simplification of a safety orientation scale using a sample of seafarers working for Norwegian ship owners. Safety Science, 2009, 47(3): 305–326, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.05.002.
TEO E. A. L., LING F. Y. Y., and CHONG A. F. W. Framework for project managers to manage construction safety. International Journal of Project Management, 2005, 23(4): 329–341, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.09.001.
ZOHAR D. Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations: Theoretical and Applied Implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65(1), 96–102, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96.
ILO. World Statistic. 2011. http://www.ilo.org/moscow/areas-of-work/occupational-safety-and-health/WCMS_249278/lang--en/index.htm
JAMES L. R., JAMES L. A., and ASHE D. K. The meaning of organizations: the role of cognition and values.In SCHNEIDER B. (Ed.) Organizational climate and culture (pp. 40–84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bas, 1990.
LITWIN G. H. and STRINGER R. A. Motivation and Organizational Climate. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1968.
SCHNEIDER B., EHRHART M. G., and MACEY W. H. Organizational Climate and Culture, 2012.
ZOHAR D. Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. in QUICK J. C. and TETRICK L. E. (Eds.) Handbook of occupational health psychology., Washington: American Psychological Association, 2003: 123–142. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/10474-006.
GRIFFIN M. A. and CURCURUTO M. Safety Climate in Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2016, 3(1): 191–212, https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414.
JIANG L., LAVAYSSE L. M., and PROBST T. M. Safety climate and safety outcomes: A meta-analytic comparison of universal vs. industry-specific safety climate predictive validity. Work Stress, 2019, 33(1): 41–57, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02678373.2018.1457737.
BEUS J. M., PAYNE S. C., BERGMAN M. E., and ARTHUR W. Safety climate and injuries: An examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(4): 713–727, https://doi.org/ 10.1037/a0019164.
ALRUQI W. M., HALLOWELL M. R., and TECHERA U. Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Safety Science, 2018, 109: 165–173, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.019.
LIU X., ZHAN F. B., HONG S., et al. Replies to comments on “a bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900–2010”. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(3): 933–936, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-012-0914-3.
YANG L., CHEN Z., LIU T., et al. Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(1): 133–146, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-012-0911-6.
VAN ECK N. J. and WALTMAN L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2): 523–538, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
KHALIL G. M. and GOTWAY CRAWFORD C. A. A Bibliometric Analysis of U.S.-Based Research on the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2015, 48(1): 50–57, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.021.
RIZZI F., VAN ECK N., and FREY M. The production of scientific knowledge on renewable energies: Worldwide trends, dynamics and challenges and implications for management. Renewable Energy, 2014, 62: 657–671, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.renene.2013.08.030.
PRICE D. J. de S. and TUKEY J. W. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
DABI Y., DARRIGUES L., KATSAHIAN S., et al. Publication Trends in Bariatric Surgery: a Bibliometric Study. Obesity Surgery, 2016, 26(11): 2691–2699, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11695-016-2160-x.
CHEN Y., MCCABE B., and HYATT D. Impact of individual resilience and safety climate on safety performance and psychological stress of construction workers: A case study of the Ontario construction industry. Journal of Safety Research, 2017, 61: 167–176, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.014.
THOLÉN S. L., POUSETTE A., and TÖRNER M. Causal relations between psychosocial conditions, safety climate and safety behaviour – A multilevel investigation. Safety Science, 2013, 55: 62–69, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.12.013.
NAJI G. M. A. et al., ‘Impact of Safety Culture on Safety Performance; Mediating Role of Psychosocial Hazard: An Integrated Modelling Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(16): 8568, https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph18168568.
NAJI G. M. A., ISHA A. S. N., ALZORAIKI M., et al. Impact of Safety Culture and Psychosocial Hazard on Safety Performance among Upstream Employees in Malaysia at Oil and Gas Industry. Solid State Technology, 2020, 63(6): Art. no. 6.
LIU X., ZHAN F. B., HONG S., et al. A bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900–2010. Scientometrics, 2012, 92(3): 747–765, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-011-0599-z.
ZHENG T. et al. A bibliometric analysis of micro/nano-bubble related research: current trends, present application, and future prospects. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(1): 53–71, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-016-2004-4.
LI J. and HALE A. Identification of, and knowledge communication among core safety science journals. Safety Science, 2015, 74: 70–78. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.12.003.
SMITH D. R. Historical Development of the Journal Impact Factor and its Relevance for Occupational Health. Industrial Health, 2007, 45(6): 730–742, https://doi.org/ 10.2486/indhealth.45.730.
UGOLINI D., BONASSI S., CRISTAUDO A., et al. Temporal trend, geographic distribution, and publication quality in asbestos research. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2015, 22(9), 6957–6967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3925-1.
CHIU W.-T. and HO Y.-S. Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 2007, 73(1): 3–17, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-005-1523-1.
WALTER G., FISHER K., BLOCH S., and HUNT G. Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality. Medical Journal of Australia, 2003, 178(6): 280–281, https://doi.org/ 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05196.x.
SEXTON J. B. et al. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Services Research, 2006, 6(1): 44, https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44.
ZOHAR D. A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(4): 587–596, https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587.
ZOHAR D. Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: A leadership-based intervention model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(1): 156–163, https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.156.
ZOHAR D. The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, 23(1): 75–92, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/job.130.
ZOHAR D. Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(5): 1517–1522, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019.
ZOHAR D. and LURIA G. A Multilevel Model of Safety Climate: Cross-Level Relationships Between Organization and Group-Level Climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(4): 616–628, https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616.
CHRISTIAN M. S., BRADLEY J. C., WALLACE J. C., and BURKE M. J. Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5): 1103–1127, https://doi.org/ 10.1037/a0016172.
FLIN R., MEARNS K., O’CONNOR P., and BRYDEN R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Safety Science, 2000, 34(1–3): 177–192, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6.
GRIFFIN M. A. and NEAL A. Perceptions of Safety at Work: A Framework for Linking Safety Climate to Safety Performance, Knowledge, and Motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2000, 5: 347-358.
DAHL Ø. and KONGSVIK T. Safety climate and mindful safety practices in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Safety Research, 2018, 64: 29–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.009.
VINODKUMAR M. N. and BHASI M. Safety climate factors and its relationship with accidents and personal attributes in the chemical industry. Safety Science, 2009, 47(5): 659–667, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.09.004.
HAHN S. E. and MURPHY L. R. A short scale for measuring safety climate. Safety Science, 2008, 46(7): 1047-1066.
LIU X., HUANG G., HUANG H., et al. Safety climate, safety behavior, and worker injuries in the Chinese manufacturing industry. Safety Science, 2015, 78: 173–178, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.023.
MALLAM S. C., ERNSTSEN J., and NAZIR S. Safety in Shipping: Investigating Safety Climate in Norwegian Maritime Workers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019, 63(1): 1844–1848, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1071181319631007.
RUBIN M., GIACOMINI A., ALLEN R., et al. Identifying safety culture and safety climate variables that predict reported risk-taking among Australian coal miners: An exploratory longitudinal study. Safety Science, 2020, 123: 104564, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104564.
NAVARRO M. F. L., GRACIA LERÍN F. J., TOMÁS I., and PEIRÓ SILLA J. M. Validation of the group nuclear safety climate questionnaire. Journal of Safety Research, 2013, 46: 21–30, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.03.005.
XU J., GE Y., QU W., et al. The mediating effect of traffic safety climate between pedestrian inconvenience and pedestrian behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 119: 155–161, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.020.
O’CONNOR, P.E., O’DEA A., KENNEDY Q. and BUTTREY S.E. Measuring safety climate in aviation: A review and recommendations for the future. Safety Science, 2011, 49: 128-138..
SALEEM M. S., ALI A., and SHAIKH S. A. Impact of Internal Marketing and Human Resource Management to Foster Customer Oriented Behavior among Employees: A Study on Mega Retail Stores in Karachi. NICE Research Journal of Social Science, 2018, 11: 183-199, https://doi.org/10.51239/nrjss.v0i0.11
P. O’CONNOR, O’DEA A., KENNEDY Q., and BUTTREY S. E. Measuring safety climate in aviation: A review and recommendations for the future. Safety Science, 2011, 49(2): 128–138, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.10.001.
SCHÜLER M. and MATUSZCZYK J.V. Safety Climate in Military Organizations: A Pilot Study of an Adjusted Multi-Domain Instrument. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019, 63(1), 1373–1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631253
NEAL A. and GRIFFIN M.A. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(4): 946–953, https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946.
- There are currently no refbacks.