Analysis of Factual Model of Training Management for Junior High School Teachers North Konawe Regency in the COVID-19 Era

Monovatra Predy Rezky, Joko Sutarto, Titi Prihatin, Arief Yulianto

Abstract

Success of education is very dependent on the strategic role of teachers, therefore along with the times, teacher competence is a mandatory requirement that must be improved. This study aims to analyze the factual model of training management for state junior high school teachers in North Konawe district in conditions of COVID-19. Data collection results through closed and open interviews: some teachers in North Konawe said that their competencies were a legal requirement that must always be improved. Teachers wanted training activities still being carried out. Still, during the pandemic, some activities which used to have been routinely carried out at the P&K service are no more carried out at all. The training activities carried out were classical or face-to-face activities. So far, it has been done face-to-face, but in the era of COVID-19, it is no longer done, so it needs a special model so that it can be done or implemented. It has been more or less 2 years that the education and training activities are no longer carried out. In the implementation of the training, it is carried out for 5 days of activities, with the training participants being given permission to temporarily not carry out their main tasks and staying in a hotel where it has been agreed to carry out the training even though the activities must be carried out considering demand the teachers must master 4 teacher competencies. In closed interviews, it was found that respondents who had been carrying out face-to-face training, experienced obstacles. It is believed that the Technology Acceptance Model from Davis can solve this, so it is necessary to hold a training development management to accommodate training participants in the COVID-19 era.

 

Keywords: education & training management, technology acceptance model, COVID-19.


Full Text:

PDF


References


GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System. Government of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, 2003.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE. Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 23 of 2013, Amendment to Regulation of the Minister of National Education Number 15 of 2010 concerning Minimum Service Standards for Basic Education in Districts/Cities. Government of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, 2013.

GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA. Law #14 of 2005. Government of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, 2005. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/49346/pp-no-14-tahun-2005

SULAEMAN A. A. Problem based learning strategies to enhance the creativity of biological teachers in developing props. Edusains, 2019, 11(1): 29–40. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/edusains/article/view/8731

DICK W., CAREY L., CAREY J. O. The systematic design of instruction. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2009

DESSLER G. Resource Management Thirteenth Edition. Florida International University, Miami, 2013.

ROHMAH F., BUDIWATI H., and SULISTYAN R. B. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pemerintah Desa Banjarwaru Kecamatan Lumajang Kabupaten Lumajang. Transformation of Accounting & Business in Era Revolution Industri 4.0, 2019, 2(1): 526-531. http://proceedings.stiewidyagamalumajang.ac.id/index.php/progress/article/view/191

BUDIARTI A. Chapter 2 The Theory Foundation. Application and Literature Analysis. Fasilkom UI, Depok, 2006.

HESTANTO. Management Theory According to George R. Terry. Hestanto, 2011. https://www.hestanto.web.id/teori-manajemen-menurut-george-r-terry/

TORANG S. Fungsi-Fungsi Nilai Budaya Lokal Pada Organisasi Publik. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 2016, 29(3): 167-173. https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKP/article/view/2532/0

SUKARNA. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2011.

FISHBEIN M., & AJZEN, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1975. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html

SUTARTO J., SUNGKOWO E. M., SHOFWAN I., and YUDI S. The Impact of E-Training Model on the Improvement of Professional Competence of PAUD-DIKMAS Educators. Knowledge E Social Sciences, 2019: 290–300. https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/view/4722/9492

SUTARTO J. Determining Factors That Affect the Quality of Process and Training Results of Non-Formal PAUD Educators in Indonesia. Lköğretim Online, 20(2): 228–236. https://www.bibliomed.org/mnsfulltext/218/218-1612832088.pdf?1627049521

ISMAIL A., ROZNIZA Z., NORHASHIMAH H., and JOOHARI A. The Impact of E-NPQEL on the Continuance Intention of Using e-Training among Aspired School Leaders in Malaysia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2020, 14(19): 109–123. https://www.online-journals.org/index.php/i-jim/article/view/15965

SOEDERBERG M., LISA M., SUTTER C., WILSON M. D., BERGMAN J. J., BECKETT L. A., and GIBSON T. N. Assessment of an E-Training Tool for College Students to Improve Accuracy and Reduce Effort Associated with Reading Nutrition Labels. Journal of American College Health, 2019, 67(5): 441–448. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29979929/

DILSHAD M., SUMER K., and NAUSHEEN M. Impact of In-Service Training on Management Skills of School Teachers. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 2019, 39(4): 1431–1439. https://web.b.ebscohost.com/abstract?site=ehost&scope=site&jrnl=20742061&AN=142348187&h=%2fdQhO7o%2fi%2b94RL5oWMgwjIoEDiEByVjo%2bMGmXMrk%2fkQcDQ4iov1htkLJyEDpAphIBcBJAclTSsO6uZPjc2pmFQ%3d%3d&crl=f&resultLocal=ErrCrlNoResults&resultNs=Ehost&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d20742061%26AN%3d142348187

ALRUBAIE S. A., ALRUBAIE M. A., and HASSOON I. M. The Role of Activating Electronic Training in Increasing Efficiency of Training Process. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 1-11. http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/482

FANSURY H. Digital Content for Millennial Generations: Teaching the English Foreign Language Learner on Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(3): 1-12. http://www.jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/630

BONDAR I., HUMENCHUK A., HORBAN Y., HONCHAR L., and KOSHELIEVA O. Conceptual and Innovative Approaches of Higher Education Institutions (HEIS) to the Model of Training A Successful Specialist Formation During a Covid Pandemic. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 2021, 24(3): 1–8. https://www.abacademies.org/abstract/conceptual-and-innovative-approaches-of-higher-education-institutions-heis-to-the-model-of-training-a-successful-special-10269.html

GUNAWAN I. Indonesian Curriculum 2013: Instructional Management, Obstacles Faced by Teachers in Implementation and the Way Forward. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2017: 1–14. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icet-17/25883499

DAVIS F. D., BAGOZZI R. P., and WARSHAW P. R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8): 982-1003. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2632151

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. https://www.kominfo.go.id/

FUTURELAB. Digital literacy across the curriculum. Futurelab, 2009. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/futl06/futl06.pdf

MILES B. M., & HUBERMAN A. M. Analisa Data Kualitatif. UI-Press, Jakarta, 1992.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.