Deep Learning-Based Reliability Model for Oil and Gas Pipeline Subjected to Stress Corrosion Cracking: A Review and Concept

Afzal Ahmed Soomro, Ainul Akmar Mokhtar, Jundika Candra Kurnia, Huimin Lu

Abstract

Stress corrosion cracking is considered one of the major causes of failures in oil and gas pipelines. This is why modeling the reliability of oil and gas pipelines subjected to stress corrosion cracking is very important; at the same time it is very complex due to various parameters affecting the stress corrosion cracking. Modern modeling approaches include physical-based and data-driven models that are still not competitive to cope with the complex nature of the stress corrosion cracking mechanism. In today's research, researchers prefer machine learning oriented algorithms and models to address such complex mechanisms due to their increasing popularity. These algorithms and models have the capability of tackling multiple factors and their impact on output response, allowing a prediction of the probability of failure. This research proposes some extensive simulations that lead eventually to a rich dataset that will define some significant factors on which stress corrosion cracking depends. In addition to this, the proposed research not only involves the correlation of derived dataset with the already published dataset but will also provide a comprehensive validation in between the proposed experimental work and machine learning based simulations. This research aims to propose a model that considers the most frequent parameters so that the performance of the proposed technique can be evaluated robustly and may provide a better understanding to upcoming researchers, including oil and gas personals.

  

 

 

Keywords: corrosion, finite element, reliability, machine learning, artificial intelligence.

 

 

 


Full Text:

PDF


References


ZAKIKHANI K., NASIRI F., and ZAYED T. A Review of Failure Prediction Models for Oil and Gas Pipelines. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2020, 11(1): 03119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000407

SENOUCI A., EL-ABBASY M.S., and ZAYED T. Fuzzy-based model for predicting failure of oil pipelines. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2014, 20(4): 04014018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000181

CHALGHAM W., WU K.-Y., and MOSLEH A. System-Level Prognosis and Health Monitoring Modeling Framework and Software Implementation for Gas Pipeline System Integrity Management. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 84: 103671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103671

ZAKIKHANI K., ZAYED T., ABDRABOU B., and SENOUCI A. Modeling Failure of Oil Pipelines. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2020, 34(1): 04019088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001368

NYRKOVA L. Stress-corrosion cracking of pipe steel under complex influence of factors. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 116: 104757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104757

LIU Z., LI X., and CHENG Y. Mechanistic aspect of near-neutral pH stress corrosion cracking of pipelines under cathodic polarization. Corrosion Science, 2012, 55: 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.10.002

BUENO A., MOREIRA E., and GOMES J. Evaluation of stress corrosion cracking and hydrogen embrittlement in an API grade steel. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 36: 423-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.11.012

TANG X., & CHENG Y. Micro-electrochemical characterization of the effect of applied stress on local anodic dissolution behavior of pipeline steel under near-neutral pH condition. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 54(5): 1499-1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.09.037

CHU R., CHEN W., WANG S.-H., KING F., JACK T., and FESSLER R. Microstructure dependence of stress corrosion cracking initiation in X-65 pipeline steel exposed to a near-neutral pH soil environment. Corrosion, 2004, 60(3): 275-283. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3287732

LI R., VERHAGEN W. J., and CURRAN R. A comparative study of data-driven prognostic approaches: Stochastic and statistical models. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, Seattle, Washington, 2018: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHM.2018.8448439

LI Z., LU Y., and WANG X. Modeling of stress corrosion cracking growth rates for key structural materials of nuclear power plant. Journal of Materials Science, 2020, 55: 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03968-w

TIMASHEV S., & BUSHINSKAYA A. Diagnostics and reliability of pipeline systems. Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25307-7

BENGIO Y. Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2009, 2(1): 1–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000006

DENG L. A tutorial survey of architectures, algorithms, and applications for deep learning. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 2014, 3: e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/atsip.2013.9

JAMEEL S. M., HASHMANI M. A., REHMAN M., and BUDIMAN A. J. S. An Adaptive Deep Learning Framework for Dynamic Image Classification in the Internet of Things Environment. Sensors, 2020, 20(20): 5811. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205811

JAMEEL S. M., HASHMANI M. A., REHMAN M., and BUDIMAN A. J. C. Adaptive CNN ensemble for complex multispectral image analysis. Complexity, 2020, 2020: 8361989. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8361989

JAMEEL S. M., GILAL A. R., RIZVI S. S. H., REHMAN M., and HASHMANI M. A. Practical implications and challenges of multispectral image analysis. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies, Sukkur, 2020: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/iCoMET48670.2020.9073821

ZHANG Y., XIONG R., HE H., and LIU Z. A LSTM-RNN method for the lithuim-ion battery remaining useful life prediction. Proceedings of the Prognostics and System Health Management Conference, Harbin, 2017: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2017.8079316

LI X., ZHANG W., and DING Q. Deep learning-based remaining useful life estimation of bearings using multi-scale feature extraction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2019, 182: 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.011

ZHANG C., LIM P., QIN A. K., and TAN K. C. Multiobjective deep belief networks ensemble for remaining useful life estimation in prognostics. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2016, 28(10): 2306-2318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582798

FENTAYE A. D., UL-HAQ GILANI S. I., BAHETA A. T., and LI Y.-G. Performance-based fault diagnosis of a gas turbine engine using an integrated support vector machine and artificial neural network method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2019, 233(6): 786-802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650918812510

PENG X., ANYAOHA U., LIU Z., and TSUKADA K. Analysis of Magnetic-Flux Leakage (MFL) Data for Pipeline Corrosion Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2020, 56(6): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2020.2981450

REN C.-Y., QIAO W., and TIAN X. Natural gas pipeline corrosion rate prediction model based on BP neural network. In: CAO B. Y., & XIE X. J. (eds.) Fuzzy Engineering and Operations Research. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, Vol. 147. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012: 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28592-9_47

LIAO K., YAO Q., WU X., and JIA W. A numerical corrosion rate prediction method for direct assessment of wet gas gathering pipelines internal corrosion. Energies, 2012, 5(10): 3892-3907. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5103892

DUGSTAD A., LUNDE L., and VIDEM K. Parametric Study of CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel. NACE International, Houston, Texas, 1994.

CHAMKALANI A., NAREH'EI M. A., CHAMKALANI R., ZARGARI M. H., DEHESTANI-ARDAKANI M. R., and FARZAM M. Soft computing method for prediction of CO2 corrosion in flow lines based on neural network approach. Chemical Engineering Communications, 2013, 200(6): 731-747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2012.717311

DE MASI G., VICHI R., GENTILE M., BRUSCHI R., and GABETTA G. A neural network predictive model of pipeline internal corrosion profile. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Systems Informatics, Modeling and Simulation, 2014: 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIMS.2014.14

DE MASI G., GENTILE M., VICHI R., BRUSCHI R., and GABETTA G. Machine learning approach to corrosion assessment in subsea pipelines. OCEANS 2015-Genova, Genova, 2015: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS-Genova.2015.7271592

GABETTA G., DE MASI G., GENTILE M., VICHI R., and SCAPIN M. Pipeline Internal Damage Prediction by Deterministic Models and Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, 2014: SPE-171919-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/171919-MS

DIN M., ITHNIN N., ZAIN A., NOOR N., SIRAJ M., and RASOL R. An artificial neural network modeling for pipeline corrosion growth prediction. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2015, 10(2): 512-519. https://arpnjournals.com/jeas/research_papers/rp_2015/jeas_0215_1484.pdf

MAZZELLA J., HAYDEN T., KRISSA L., and TSAPRAILIS H. Estimating Corrosion Growth Rate for Underground Pipeline: A Machine Learning Based Approach. CORROSION 2019, 2019.

NAYAK N., ANARGHYA A., and AL ADHOUBI M. A study on the behavior of CO2 corrosion on pipeline using computational fluid dynamics, experimental and artificial neural network approach. Engineering Research Express, 2020, 2(2): 025012. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ab69d6

SINHA S. K., & PANDEY M. D. Probabilistic neural network for reliability assessment of oil and gas pipelines. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2002, 17(5): 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8667.00279

SILAKORN P., PUNCREOBUTR T., RAKTHANMANON T., PUNPRUK S., and CHANVANICHSKUL C. The Application of ANN Artificial Neural Network to Pipeline TOLC Metal Loss Database. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, 2016: IPTC-18658-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-18658-MS

CARVALHO A., REBELLO J., SAGRILO L., CAMERINI C., and MIRANDA I. MFL signals and artificial neural networks applied to detection and classification of pipe weld defects. NDT & E International, 2006, 39(8): 661-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.04.003

TIAN J., GAO M., and LI J. Corrosion detection system for oil pipelines based on multi-sensor data fusion by improved simulated annealing neural network. Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication Technology, Guilin, 2006: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT.2006.341978

SILVA R., GUERREIRO J., and LOULA A. A study of pipe interacting corrosion defects using the FEM and neural networks. Advances in Engineering Software, 2007, 38(11-12): 868-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.047

XU W.-Z., LI C. B., CHOUNG J., and LEE J.-M. Corroded pipeline failure analysis using artificial neural network scheme. Advances in Engineering Software, 2017, 112: 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.006

CHIN K. T., ARUMUGAM T., KARUPPANAN S., and OVINIS M. Failure pressure prediction of pipeline with single corrosion defect using artificial neural network. Pipeline Science and Technology, 2020, 4(1(3)): 10-17. https://doi.org/10.28999/2514-541X-2020-4-1-10-17

LUO Z., HU X., and GAO Y. Corrosion research of wet natural gathering and transportation pipeline based on SVM. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, 2013: 964-972. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413142.102

LEE L. H., RAJKUMAR R., LO L. H., WAN C. H., and ISA D. Oil and gas pipeline failure prediction system using long range ultrasonic transducers and Euclidean-Support Vector Machines classification approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(6): 1925-1934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.006

OSSAI C. I. A Data-Driven Machine Learning Approach for Corrosion Risk Assessment—A Comparative Study. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2019, 3(2): 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc3020028

BASTIAN B. T., JASPREETH N., RANJITH S. K., and JIJI C. Visual inspection and characterization of external corrosion in pipelines using deep neural network. NDT & E International, 2019, 107: 102134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102134


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.