Analysis of Student Procrastinatory Behavior in Virtual Learning Environments Using Machine Learning

Mehak Maqbool Memon, Manzoor Ahmed Hashmani, Syed Muslim Jameel, Shamshad Junejo, Kamran Raza

Abstract

Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) are increasingly being used due to the uncertain global situation caused by COVID-19. Some major impacts of the pandemic are lockdowns and social distancing. This has led to academia taking measures to normalize the increased use of VLEs for teaching. However, this shift from face-to-face to online environments comes with many concerns—one of which is student procrastination. Procrastination is an observed student behavior of delaying tasks, which results in poor learning and can adversely affect student performance. Hence, is it essential to analyze student procrastination and determine the factors that cause this behavior whilst learning in VLEs. In this study, we present our findings on the impact of VLEs on student procrastination. We also analyze the performance of machine learning approaches to avoid manual intervention. We initially performed data collection, producing a dataset which was annotated by an expert, allowing us to visualize the pattern of student procrastination. Results confirmed the application of machine learning techniques for analysis for student’s behavior. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of supervised approaches with an accuracy of up to 83%. In contrast, unsupervised approaches do not seem appropriate for this task. We hope that future work based on this study will allow automatic data annotation based on a trained machine learning model. The findings of our work will help identify students prone to procrastinating and allow intervention to maintain their academic performance. The expected implication of the presented study is an improvement of educational practices, helping teachers and demonstrators to gain a better understanding of students’ behaviors.

 

 

Keywords: virtual learning environment, distance learning, machine learning, artificial neural networks, multi-layer perceptron, procrastination.


Full Text:

PDF


References


ROVAI A. P., & JORDAN H. Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2004, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2

MUSLIM J. S., AHMED H. M., HUSSAIN R. S. S., VALI U., and MOBASHAR R. Automatic Image Annotation for Small and Ad hoc Intelligent Applications using Raspberry Pi. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2019, 255: 01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925501003

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. Distance Learning Solutions, 2020. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/solutions

ITU NEWS. COVID-19: How digital learning solutions are taking shape, 2020. https://www.itu.int/ru/myitu/News/2020/05/06/09/00/COVID-19-How-digital-learning-solutions-are-taking-shape

COMMONWEALTH OF LEARNING. Keeping the doors of learning open COVID-19, 2020. https://www.col.org/resources/keeping-doors-learning-open-covid-19

AGARWAL A. EDX, 2012. https://www.edx.org/

EREN BALI O. C., & BIYANI G. Udemy, 2020. https://www.udemy.com/

FUTURE LEARN, 2012. https://www.futurelearn.com/

NG A. Coursera, 2012. https://www.coursera.org/instructor/andrewng

TIBBETT T., & FERRARI J. Return to the origin: what creates a procrastination identity? Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2019, 7(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2018.75648

SUSILAWATI E. The Influence of Gadget towards Information Technology Addict and Procrastination Behaviour. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 662(2): 022054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/662/2/022054

SHEYBANI F., GHARRAEE B., BAKHSHIZADEH M., and TAMANAEEFAR S. J. L. Decisional procrastination: Prevalence among students and relationship with emotional intelligence and big five-factor model of personality. Life, 2017, 50: 26.

STEEL P. The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 2007, 133(1): 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65

SOLOMON L. J., & ROTHBLUM E. D. Academic Procrastination: Frequency and Cognitive-Behavioral Correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1984, 31: 503-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503

HARLEN W. On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In: GARDNER J. (ed.) Assessment and Learning. Sage, London, 2012: 87-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.n6

DIXSON D. D., & WORRELL F. C. Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 2016, 55(2): 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

BROADBENT J., PANADERO E., and BOUD D. Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018, 43(2): 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455

HOOSHYAR D., PEDASTE M., and YANG Y. Mining Educational Data to Predict Students’ Performance through Procrastination Behavior. Entropy, 2020, 22(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22010012

AKRAM A., FU C., LI Y., JAVED M. Y., LIN R., JIANG Y., and TANG Y. Predicting students’ academic procrastination in blended learning course using homework submission data. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 102487-102498. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930867

CEREZO R., ESTEBAN M., SÁNCHEZ-SANTILLÁN M., and NÚÑEZ J. C. Procrastinating Behavior in Computer-Based Learning Environments to Predict Performance: A Case Study in Moodle. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8: 1403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01403

IATRELLIS O., SAVVAS I. K., KAMEAS A., and FITSILIS P. J. E. Integrated learning pathways in higher education: A framework enhanced with machine learning and semantics. Education and Information Technologies, 2020, 25: 3109–3129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10105-7

PENG W., ZHANG X., and LI X. Intelligent Behavior Data Analysis for Internet Addiction. Scientific Programming, 2019, 2019: 2753152. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2753152

SALLOUM S. A., ALSHURIDEH M., ELNAGAR A., and SHAALAN K. Mining in Educational Data: Review and Future Directions. In: HASSANIEN A. E., AZAR A., GABER T., OLIVA D., and TOLBA F. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision (AICV2020). AICV 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1153. Springer, Cham, 2020: 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_9

KUZILEK J., HLOSTA M., and ZDRAHAL Z. Open University Learning Analytics dataset. Scientific Data, 2017, 4: 170171. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.171

JAMEEL S. M., HASHMANI M. A., REHMAN M., and BUDIMAN A. Adaptive CNN Ensemble for Complex Multispectral Image Analysis. Complexity, 2020, 2020: 8361989. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8361989

RADIF M., & MOHAMMED N. A. Computer Science Teacher’s Perception and Needs towards E-Learning in Iraq. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.5.42

HAMOUD A. K., & HUMADI A. M. Student’s Success Prediction Model Based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and A Combination of Feature Selection Methods. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(3). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.3.25


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.