Soil Arch Effect Analysis and Earth Pressure Calculating Method for Finite Width Soil behind Retaining Wall

Yang Minghui, Wu Zhiyong, Zhao Minghua


 The formation mechanism of soil arching effect behind the retaining wall was significantly analyzed in the case of limited backfill width. It is assumed that the small principal stress arch is circular arc. Considering the limit equilibrium condition of the friction point between the retaining wall and the soil,the expression of the deflection angle of the large and small principal stress was derived. On this basis,considering the translational displacement mode of rigid retaining wall and the horizontal differential element method,the theoretical expressions of active earth pressure resultant force and intensity distribution of finite width soil behind the wall were established. Comparison with laboratory test data and previous methods indicates that the earth pressure value obtained by this method has preferably rationality. Finally,the distribution of the active earth pressure was analyzed under different ratios n of the width to height of the backfill. The results show that the active earth pressure increases with the increasing n,but approaches to a constant value as n reaches a threshold of limited width of 0.5.


Keywords:   the active earth pressure,  limited backfill,  soil arching effect,  curved slip surface,  horizontal differential element method

Full Text:



GB50007—2002 Code for design of building foundation [S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2002:31—33.(In Chinese)

GONG X N. Soil mechanics [M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2002:135-176(. In Chinese)

YANG C W,ZHAO M H. Force analysis of bridge double -piles foundation in high and steep cross slopes[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences),2018,45(3):129—135. (In Chinese)

XIAO N,GAO X J. A brief talk on the calculation of earth pressure of finite range filling [J]. Mineral Exploration,2009,12(12):45— 47. (In Chinese)

JIANG C,LI T B. Study on pile side resistance limit coefficient of row pile supported ming dig tunnel excavation foundation pit[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences),2018,45(7): 111—116. (In Chinese)

TERZAGHI K. Large retaining wall tests Ⅰ-pressure of dry sand[J]. News Record,1936,112(1):136—140.

HANDY R L. The arch in soil arching [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1985,111(3):302—318.

PAIK K H,SALGADO R. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effect [J]. Geotechnique,

YIN Z Q,SHE C X,YAO H L. Research on earth pressure behind row piles from clayey backfill considering soil arching effect[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2018,39(S1):140—148.(In Chinese)

LIU Y,YU P Q. Analysis of soil arch and active earth pressure on translating rigid retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019,40(2):506—516 (In Chinese)

GRECO V. Active thrust on retaining walls of narrow backfill width[J]. Computers and Geotechnics,2013,50:66—78.

GRECO V. Analytical solution of seismic pseudo-static active thrust acting on fascia retaining walls [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2014,57:25—36.

FRYDMAN S,KEISSAR I. Earth pressures on retaining walls near rock faces [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,ASCE, 1987,113(6):586—599.

FAN C H,FANG Y S. Numerical solution of active earth pressures on rigid retaining walls built near rock faces [J]. Computers and Geotechnics,2010,37:1023—1029.

YING H W,WANG X G,ZHANG J H. Analysis on heave-resistant stability considering the effect of excavation width[J]. Engineering Mechanics,2018,35(5):127—133. (In Chinese)


  • There are currently no refbacks.