Capacity Analysis of Precast Piles Connection with Cast in Situ Pillars
Abstract
The dominant axial force on reinforced concrete bridge columns may affect the ability of pillars to respond to various lateral excitations. This study aimed to analyze the strength of concrete, tensile behavior, and shear strength in the pillar structure of a bridge. The method used to identify the behavior of pillars is to separately analyze the internal capacity of the pillars according to the characteristics of concrete and steel quality, cross-sectional shape, and the configuration of the reinforcement installed in three sections along the pillar height. By checking the adequacy of the lap joints and the length of reinforcement distribution, we assume that the dominant pillar is in tension or compression. We also assume that the dominance of tension in the reinforcement joints is in anticipation of a tensile response in the reinforcement joints when bending behavior is dominant (for tall pillars). Curvature: Analyzing the relationship of force–lateral displacement by simulating the height of the pillars from 1 to 5 m and comparing it with the shear capacity of the pillars so that a confining reinforcement spacing of 50 mm is obtained both on the precast pile and the additional cast in situ pier has been increasing the compressive strength and strain of the pillars so that with a factored axial compressive force of 730 kN, it produces compressive stress at the effective cross-section of the pillar of 13 MPa, which means that the strength of the concrete on the pillars is still sufficient. The shear capacity of the pillar obtained by factored loading is from 17 to 86 kN, so the pillar is still safe from shear failure along its height.
Keywords: bridge, capacity, connection, precast pillar.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
COHEN J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 1992, 112(1): 155-159. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
ALI Z., KHAN W. A., and KHAN T. Economic and Socio-cultural Impacts of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Under One Belt One Road (OBOR). Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, 2022, 5(2). https://www.pjia.com.pk/index.php/pjia/article/download/676/488
ZAINAL A., FARZA T.C.N., PUTRA P.D., HARAHAP K., and WELLY Y. Government Governance, Government Quality, Transportation Infrastructure, and the Economic Growth: Evidence from Indonesia. Samudra Journal of Economics and Business, 2023, 14(1): 113-128. DOI: 10.33059/jseb.v14i1.5701
KONDOLF G.M., and PINTO P.J. The social connectivity of urban rivers. Geomorphology, 2017, 277: 182-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.028
THOMPSON P.D., SMALL E.P., JOHNSON M., and MARSHALL A.R. The Pontis bridge management system. Structural Engineering International, 1998, 8(4): 303-308. DOI: 10.2749/101686698780488758
ESMAEILY A., and XIAO Y. Behavior of reinforced concrete columns under variable axial loads: analysis. ACI Structural Journal, 2005, 102(5): 736. DOI: 10.14359/14669
RAHMAN M.J., BUDIONO B., SURONO A., and PANE I. Improving the Performance of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Pillars/Columns with Hollow Square Sections under Cyclic Loading with Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC). In: Proceedings of the National Civil Engineering Postgraduate Conference, 2011: 20.
AFIFI M.Z., MOHAMED H.M., CHAALLAL O., and BENMOKRANE B. Confinement model for concrete columns internally confined with carbon FRP spirals and hoops. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(9): 04014219. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001197
IBRAHIM A., HUAT B.B., ASADI A., and NAHAZANAN H. Foundation and embankment construction in peat: An overview. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 19: 10079-10094. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269337391_Foundation_and_Embankment_Construction_in_Peat_An_Overview
BENTZ E.C., and COLLINS M.P. Development of the 2004 Canadian Standards Association (CSA) A23.3 shear provisions for reinforced concrete. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2006, 33(5): 521-534.
MANDER J.B., PRIESTLEY M.J., and PARK R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804-1826.
POPOVICS S. A review of the concrete consolidation by vibration. Materials and Structures, 1973, 6: 453-463.
PAULTRE P., and LÉGERON F. Confinement reinforcement design for reinforced concrete columns. Journal of structural engineering, 2008, 134(5): 738-749.
KOTSOVOS M.D. Reinforced Concrete Shear Design: Shortcomings and Remedy. ACI Structural Journal, 2017, 114(4).
SETAREH M., and DARVAS R. Concrete structures. Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007.
CALTRANS. Bridge Design Specifications. California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), 2004. https://pdfcoffee.com/qdownload/bridge-design-specification-caltrans-pdf-free.html
HSU T.T.S. (ed.). Concrete Structures in Earthquake. Springer Nature Singapore, 2019.
PRIESTLEY M.N., SEIBLE F., and CALVI G.M. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172858
CLARKE A., MIKE F., and MARY S. The Use of Technology in Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2015, 1(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2015.010829
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.