Induction and Multiplication of Thornless Rubus Glaucus Callogenesis from Leaves

Lina María Arbeláez-Arias, Juan Carlos Lucas-Aguirre, Luis Gonzaga Gutiérrez-López

Abstract

The genus Rubus has the highest number of representatives within the Rosaceae family and is one of the most diverse in the Plantae kingdom, an economically important crop in the Andean region. In Colombia, the Castilla blackberry (Rubus glaucus Benth.) stands out among the cultivated species because of its various fruit size, color, and quality. This research aimed to conduct a callogenesis induction and then pro-embryogenic callus induction, where blackberry vitroplants were taken without stings in the multiplication stage; auxins such as 2,4-D and Picloram were used as growth regulators in six concentrations, with and without the presence of light. For callus multiplication, embryogenic calluses obtained during the induction phase were selected. These calluses were divided into portions approximately 0.5 cm in diameter with an initial approximate weight of 1.2 g. The analysis of variance yielded that statistically significant differences exist among the different treatments (p ˂ 0.05), where callus formation with the Picloram hormone at different concentrations, with the presence of light and darkness, indicated that the most callus formation was verified with the 1.0 mg/l concentration and under darkness, (4.92 calluses on average). For embryogenic callus multiplication, analysis of variance indicated that the highest weight averages corresponded to the 3.0 mg/l treatment of 2,4-D combined with 3.0 mg/l of BAP for a mean of 3.5 under light conditions and 2.79 under darkness.

 

Keywords: callogenesis, hormones, embryogenesis, vitroplants.

 

https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.10.1


Full Text:

PDF


References


SCHMIDT-DURÁN A., ALVARADO-ULLOA C., CHACÓN-CERDAS R., ALVARADO-MARCHENA L.F., and FLORES-MORA D. Callogenesis and cell suspension establishment of tropical highland blackberry (Rubus adenotrichos Schltdl.) and its microscopic analysis. Springer Plus, 2016, 5, 1717. DOI: 10.1186/s40064‐016‐3381‐0.

FRANCO G., BERNAL ESTRADA J.A., DIAZ DÍEZ C.A., TAMAYO VELEZ A., TAMAYO MOLANO P.J., ORREGO C.E., SALGADO ARISTIZÁBAL N., RODRÍGUEZ L.J., RODRÍGUEZ Y.A., DÍAZ-MONTAÑO J., GARCIA MUÑOZ M.C., AGUILERA ARANGO G.A., ARGÜELLES CÁRDENAS J.H., SALDARRIAGA CARDONA A., VÁSQUEZ GALLO L.A., DÍAZ-MONTILLA A.E., HENAO ROJAS J.C., BETANCOURT VÁSQUEZ M., MARTÍNEZ LEMUS E.P., and COTES A.M. Technology for the cultivation of blackberry (Rubus glaucus Benth.). Colombian Agricultural Research Corporation (AGROSAVIA), 2019.

CLAVIJO J., and PEDRAZA J. Characterization of the thornless blackberry from Castilla (Work presented by the National Learning Service agriculture instructors to the Technical Pedagogical Committee). National Learning Service, Quindío Regional. Armenia, Colombia, 2004.

MUMTAZ S., AHMAD T., AHMAD-HAFIZ I., YASEEN M., and AKHTAR-ABBASI N. Callogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants of citrus cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(4): 1017-1023.

IVANOVA Z., GROZEVA S., and VELKOV N. Induction of callogenesis and organogenesis of different melon genotypes. Journal of BioScience and Biotechnology, 2017, 6(2): 99-104.

GURAV S.S., GURAV N.S., PATIL A.T., and DURAGKAR H.J. Effect of Explant Source, Culture Media, and Growth Regulators on Callogenesis and Expression of Secondary Metabolites of Curcuma Longa. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants, 2020, 26(2): 172-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496475.2019.1689542

KULUS D., and TYMOSZUK A. Induction of Callogenesis, Organogenesis, and Embryogenesis in Non-Meristematic Explants of Bleeding Heart and Evaluation of Chemical Diversity of Key Metabolites from Callus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21, 5826. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165826.

MURASHIGE T., and SKOOG F.A. Revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 1962, 15: 473-497.

MARULANDA M., CARVAJALINO M., and VENTO H. Establishment and in vitro Multiplication of Selected Rubus glaucus Benth Plants. for the Department of Risaralda (Colombia). Biological News, 2000, 22 (73): 121-129.

VILAS-HARALKAR K., and RAOSAHEB-BIRADAR S. Callogenesis and rhizogenesis of Viola odorata L. Vegetal biotechnology, 2020, 20(4): 283-289.

TALENGERA D., MWAMI C., TAZUBA A.F., and NAMUKWAYA B. Improved callogenesis and plant regeneration from immature male flowers of east African highland banana CV. “Nakitembe” (AAA-EA). African Crop Science Journal, 2021, 29(3): 373-382. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v29i3.4

STEFENON V.M., MARQUES-PINHEIRO M.V., DE FREITAS F.R., DA SILVA V.J.B., VIEIRA P., DOS SANTOS D.D., and GUERRA M.P. In vitro callogenesis for the induction of somatic embryogenesis and antioxidant production in Eugenia uniflora. Vegetal biotechnology, 2020, 20(2): 135-146.

COUTIÑO-CORTÉS A.G., BERTOLINI V., IRACHETA-DONJUAN L., RUÍZ-MONTOYA L., and VALLE-MORA J.F. In vitro callogenesis induction of Guarianthe skinneri (Bateman) Dressler and W.E. Higgins (Orchidaceae). Acta Agronomica, 2017, 66(2): 254-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/acag.v66n2.57982

BIBERACH F. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Musa sp. cultivars. Magister Thesis. CATIE Turrialba, Costa Rica, 1995.

MARTÍNEZ M., SOLANO A., and PACHECO J. Some Factors Affecting Somatic Embryogenesis in Juvenile Tissues of Rubus glaucus Benth. Journal of the Colombian Association of Biological Sciences, 2005, 17: 95-107.

CARRÓN M.P., ENJALRIC F, LARDET L., and DESCHAMPS A. Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Mull. Arg.) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, 1998, 5(II).

CARRÓN M.P., ETTIENNE H, MICHAUX-FERRIERE N., and MONTORO P. Somatic Embryogenesis in Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Mull.Arg.) Somatic Embyogenesis in Woody Plants, 1995, 2: 117-136.

ETTIENNE H., and CARRON B.A. Water status of Callus from hevea brasiliensis during induction of somatic embryogenesis. Plant, Copenhagen, 1995: 213-218.

THORPE T.A. Organognesis in vitro structural, phycological and biochemical aspects. International Review of Cytology, 1980, S11A: 71-111.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.