The Role of the Augmented Real-Time Feedback to Overcome the Imbalance of Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Social Interaction in Physical Education Class
Abstract
The motor learning process requires the inter-coordination of the cognitive, emotional, and psychomotor stages. Diversity in students' cognitive abilities and emotions is a challenge in physical education. The issue has been stated that physical education is an area of less interest, thus resulting in lower student interaction with the social environment. Peer teaching is a method offered to combine the cognitive and emotional aspects of performing psychomotor tasks. This study investigates whether peer teaching can be used as a solution to the imbalance between psychomotor performance and social interaction in physical education. For 10 years, consecutive international papers published in the years 2012-2022 have been screened and reviewed from the ERIC database website according to PRISMA guidelines with specific keyword criteria. Finally, a total of 10 journals were taken as final summarized in the conclusion explaining the results of this study. Peer teaching has been cited as one of the learning models that can overcome the imbalance between psychomotor skills and social interaction. It has a better transfer of knowledge, skills, and social interactions in multicultural classes. Concerning physical education, peer teaching serves as an effective learning model for improving cognitive skills, motor skills, and social interaction at the same time. In addition to student diversity, this learning model can balance student abilities parallel. The concept of peer teaching with peer assistance makes a positive contribution to the practice of physical education. Students' psychomotor skills that are unevenly distributed are supported by their peers, and so their social interaction skills are. It can be concluded as a novelty that Peer teaching provides a positive contribution to a healthier social life, improved motor skills, and behavioral coordination through physical education interaction.
Keywords: peer teaching, physical education, psychomotor, social interaction, school.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ALMERICH G., SUÁREZ-RODRÍGUEZ J., DÍAZ-GARCÍA I., and ORELLANA N. Structure of 21st century competences in students in the sphere of education. influential personal factors. Educacion XX1, 2020, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.23853
SONG G., & WANG Z. Factors influencing middle school students' interdisciplinary competence in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2021, 58(7), 1041-1072. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21692
LUMBANTOBING P. A. The Contribution of Lecturer Pedagogical Competence, Intellectual Intelligence and Self-Efficacy of Student Learning Motivation. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, 2020, 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i1.852
KURUM G., & CINKIR S. An authentic look at evaluation in education: A school self-evaluation1 model supporting school development. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019, 2019(83), 253-286. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.83.12
SARMASOGLU S., DINÇ L., and ELÇIN M. Using standardized patients in nursing education: Effects on students' psychomotor skill development. Nurse Educator, 2016, 41(2), 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000188
SON S. H., KO Y. J., and KIM J. S. Self-esteem and social development according to participation in school sports club. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 2021, 17(3), 164-168. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.2142286.143
PELED Y. Cyberbullying and its influence on academic, social, and emotional development of undergraduate students. Heliyon, 2019, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01393
LUFT A. R., & BUITRAGO M. M. Stages of motor skill learning. Molecular Neurobiology, 2005, 205–216.
https://doi.org/10.1385/MN:32:3:205
SILVA R., FARIAS C., and MESQUITA I. Cooperative learning contribution to student social learning and active role in the class. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 8644.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158644
NAUMCHUK V. I. Characterization of the four-stage structure of the process of learning motor actions in sports games. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 2019, 7(4), 81-88.
https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2019.070403
SPAMPINATO D., & CELNIK P. Multiple Motor Learning Processes in Humans: Defining Their Neurophysiological Bases. Neuroscientist, 2021, 27.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420939552
BARDACH L., & KLASSEN R.M. Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers' cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 2020, 30, 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100312
HERTZ U. Learning how to behave: Cognitive learning processes account for asymmetries in adaptation to social norms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences, 2021, 288(1952).
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0293
BAKER M., & O'BRIEN W. Rethinking outdoor leadership: An Investigation of Affective Abilities in Australian Higher Education curriculum. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2020, 20, 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2019.1634598
KUSUMA M. N. H., LISTIANDI A. D., HIDAYAT R., WIDANITA N., and ANGGRAENI D. The Effectiveness of Multilateral Drills on Cognitive and Psychomotor Ability for Male Sport Students. Mapping Intimacies, 2021, 24(03). https://doi.org/10.36295/ASRO.2021.24347
WU P. C., TSAI C. L., WU H. L., YANG Y. H., and KUO H. K. Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset and progression in school children. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(5), pp. 1080-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.009
RAW R. K., WILKIE R. M., ALLEN R. J., WARBURTON M., LEONETTI M., WILLIAMS J. H. G., and MON-WILLIAMS M. Skill acquisition as a function of age, hand and task difficulty: Interactions between cognition and action. PLoS One, 2019, 14, e0211706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211706
SÖNMEZ V. Association of Cognitive, Affective, Psychomotor and Intuitive Domains in Education, Sönmez Model, Univers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2017, 5(3), pp. 347-356. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050307
MEIER S., RAAB A., HÖGER B., and DIKETMÜLLER R. Same, same, but different?!' Investigating diversity issues in the current Austrian National Curriculum for Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 2022, 28(1), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211027072
SILJAMÄKI M. E., & ANTTILA E. H. Developing Future Physical Education Teachers' Intercultural Competence: The Potential of Intertwinement of Transformative, Embodied, and Critical Approaches. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2021, 3.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.765513
LISTIANDI A. D., KUSUMA M. N., SYAFEI M., BUDI D. R., HIDAYAT R., SUHARTOYO T., WIDANITA N., and ANGGRAENI D. The dominant throwing technique (nagewaza) which produces Ippon in female judo match at the 18th national sports week (PON XVIII) in Riau. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 2019, 22(11), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.36295/ASRO.2019.22118
TANI G., BASTOS F. H., SILVEIRA S. R., BASSO L., and CORRÊA U. C. Professional learning in physical education in Brazil: issues and challenges of a complex system. Sport, Education and Society, 2021, 26(7), 773-787. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1818557
YANG Q. F., HWANG G. J., and SUNG H. Y. Trends and research issues of mobile learning studies in physical education: a review of academic journal publications, Interact. Interactive Learning Environments, 2020, 28(4), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1533478
CHIVA-BARTOLL O., MARAVÉ-VIVAS M., SALVADOR-GARCÍA C., and VALVERDE-ESTEVE T. Impact of a physical education service-learning programme on ASD children: A mixed-methods approach. Children and Youth Services Review, 2021, 126, 106008.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106008
CAPELLA-PERIS C., GIL-GÓMEZ J., and CHIVA-BARTOLL Ò. Innovative analysis of service-learning effects in physical education: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2020, 39(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0030
WANG X., & LIU Y. L. Cooperative learning method in physical education teaching based on multiple intelligence theory. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2018, 18(5), 2176-2186. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.5.117
KUSUMA M.N.H. Effect of cold water and contrast immersion on physiological and psychological responses of elite athletes after high-intensity exercises. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2021, 21, 3278-3287. https://doi:10.7752/jpes.2021.s6446
ASÚN S., CHIVITE M. T., and ROMERO M. R. Perceptions of professional competences in Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE). Sustainability, 2020, 12(9), 3812. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093812
GAL A., & FALLIK O. Learn from Each Other: A Peer-Teaching Model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2022, 17(3), e2242. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10896
MURPHY F., MARRON S., and COULTER M. Primary field experiences: Critical for primary generalist physical education teachers? European Physical Education Review, 2021, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X21991188
HSIA S., TRAN D. N., BEECHINOR R., GAHBAUER A., FITZSIMMONS A., and BROCK T. Interprofessional peer teaching: The value of a pharmacy student-led pharmacology course for physical therapy students. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2020, 12(10), 1252-1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.05.010
DEMETRIOU Y., REIMERS A. K., ALESI M., SCIFO L., BORREGO C.C., MONTEIRO D., and KELSO A. Effects of school-based interventions on motivation towards physical activity in children and adolescents: Protocol for a systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 2019, 8, 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1029-1
EATHER N., RILEY N., MILLER D., and IMIG S. Evaluating the Impact of Two Dialogical Feedback Methods for Improving Pre-Service Teacher's Perceived Confidence and Competence to Teach Physical Education Within Authentic Learning Environments. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2019, 7(8), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i8.4053
BORES-GARCÍA D., HORTIGÜELA-ALCALÁ D., GONZÁLEZ-CALVO G., and BARBA-MARTÍN R. Peer assessment in physical education: A systematic review of the last five years. Sustainability, 2020, 12(21), 9233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219233
STIGMAR M. Peer-to-peer Teaching in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 2016, 24(2), 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963
AARTUN I., WALSETH K., STANDAL Ø. F., and KIRK D. Pedagogies of embodiment in physical education-a literature review. Sport, Education and Society, 2022, 27(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1821182
TERAOKA E., FERREIRA H.J., KIRK D., and BARDID F. Affective learning in physical education: A systematic review. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2021, 40, 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0298
WHITE R. L., BENNIE A., VASCONCELLOS D., CINELLI R., HILLAND T., OWEN K. B., and LONSDALE C. Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2021, 99, 103247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247
EATHER N., RILEY N., MILLER D., and JONES, B. Evaluating the effectiveness of using peer-dialogue assessment (PDA) for improving pre-service teachers' perceived confidence and competence to teach physical education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 2017, 42(1), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n1.5
AYŞE D.M. The effects of peer teaching on the university students achievements in cognitive, affective, psychomotor domains and game performances in volleyball courses. Educational Research and Reviews, 2014, 9(9), pp. 262-271. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1690
KUSUMA M. N. H. Mathematical simulation approach to diagnose performance limiting factor of shot put technique. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1778, 012038.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1778/1/012038
DELNERO T., & VYAS D. Peer Teaching in an Interprofessional Education Activity Focused on Professional Skills Development. Pharmacy, 2021, 9(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020112
MARTTINEN R., LANDI D., NOVAK D., and SILVERMAN S. A systematic analysis of research on teaching in physical education: Two decades of progress. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2020, 39(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0106
LOWTON-SMITH S., MORGAN R., STANLEY M., HAMES T., SMITH P., LAWSON C., and LEDDINGTON WRIGHT S. Peer-to-peer teaching: Experience of 3rd year undergraduate sports therapy students and impact upon applied academic performance. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 2019, 25, 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.04.002
VIANA R. B., CAMPOS M. H., SANTOS D. A. T., XAVIER I. C. M., VANCINI R. L., ANDRADE M. S., and DE LIRA C. A. B. Improving Academic Performance of Sport and Exercise Science Undergraduate Students in Gross Anatomy Using a Near-Peer Teaching Program. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2019, 12(1), 74-81.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1790
COLLIER C. S. Teaching Responsibility through Physical Activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2016, 16(2), 256–258. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.16.2.256
XIE J., SU B., ZHANG R., LI Y., and MA Y. Effects of facilitating reflection teaching integrated sport education on baseball team students' critical thinking disposition and game performance. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 2020, 71.
https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.71.7
FARIAS C., MESQUITA I., HASTIE P. A., and O'DONOVAN T. Mediating Peer Teaching for Learning Games: An Action Research Intervention Across Three Consecutive Sport Education Seasons. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2018, 89(1), 91-102.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2017.1402114
JENNY S. E., SCHARY D. P., NOBLE K. M., and HAMILL S. D. The Effectiveness of Developing Motor Skills Through Motion-Based Video Gaming: A Review. Simulation & Gaming, 2017, 48(6).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117738552
BRANNAGAN K. B., DELLINGER A., THOMAS J., MITCHELL D., LEWIS-TRABEAUX S., and DUPRE S. Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: Perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge. Nurse Education Today, 2013, 33(11), 1440-1447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.018
BRIX J., GRAINGER P., and HILL A. Investigating mandatory peer review of teaching in schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 2014, 39, 82-99. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n4.3
FARIAS C., WALLHEAD T., and MESQUITA I. The Project Changed My Life": Sport Education's Transformative Potential on Student Physical Literacy. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2020, 91(2), 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019.1661948
JENKINSON K.A., NAUGHTON G., and BENSON A.C. Peer-assisted learning in school physical education, sport and physical activity programmes: A systematic review. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2014, 19, 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.754004
WILTSHIRE G., LEE J., and EVANS J. You don't want to stand out as the bigger one': exploring how PE and school sport participation is influenced by pupils and their peers. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2017, 22, 548-561.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1294673
DARNIS F., & LAFONT L. Cooperative learning and dyadic interactions: two modes of knowledge construction in socio-constructivist settings for team-sport teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2015, 20, 459-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2013.803528
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
