The Effect of FDM Process Parameters on the Compressive Property of ABS Prints

Tahseen Fadhil Abbas, Khalida Kadhim Mansor, Hind Basil Ali

Abstract

Most 3D-printed FDM items are not solid-printed because printing solids requires a large amount of material and a relatively long printing time, both of which result in higher printing costs. Most items are printed with a hard shell and proper infill density to optimize the printing process. The shell width, the filling density, the infill pattern, and the thickness of the layer all play an important role in the quality of the printed items. This new work aims to characterize the FDM process to apply this technology in printing parts to withstand stresses by focusing on the most important process parameters that contribute to improving the bearing of parts when exposed to compression. For this purpose, the effects of four main parameters of the FDM, which are: infill density, outer shell width, infill pattern, and layer thickness, with different levels of each parameter, were investigated, and the effect of each of these parameters on the compressive property of the printed parts was also examined. The Taguchi method was used to design the experiments so that all parameter levels were tested in the fewest possible number of tests. The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) was also used to clarify and measure the effect of the process variables on the compressive property. The compression test was adopted as the basis for analyzing test results, which confirmed that the effect of the infill density on the compressive resistance can be classified at a strong level (rank 1), and that of the outer shell width on the compressive resistance can be classified at a level ranging from medium to strong (rank 2), while that of the infill pattern on the compressive resistance can be classified at a range from weak to medium level (rank 3), and the effect of the layer thickness on the compressive resistance can be classified as weak (rank 4). This work provides an opportunity to improve the functionality of the multipurpose FDM process, which can be used to reduce the number of raw materials required, efficiently shorten printing times, and enhance the compressive properties to meet the needs of FDM print design better.

 

Keywords: fused deposition modeling, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, outer shell width, infill density, infill pattern, layer thickness, compressive strength.

 

https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.49.7.17


Full Text:

PDF


References


TOFAIL S A M, KOUMOULOS E P, BANDYOPADHYAY A, et al. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Materials Today, 2021, 21: 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001

NGO T D, KASHANI A, IMBALZANO G, et al. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, 143: 172-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.

BROWN A C, DE BEER D, & CONRADIE P. Development of a Stereolithography (STL) input and Computer Numerical Control (CNC) output algorithm for an entry-Level 3-D printer. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2014, 25: 39-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.7166/25-2-675

VAES D, & VAN PUYVELDE P. Semi-crystalline feedstock for filament-based 3D printing of polymers. Progress in Polymer Science, 2021, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101411

SPOERK M, HOLZER C, & GONZALEZ-GUTIERREZ J. Material extrusion‐based additive manufacturing of polypropylene: A review on how to improve dimensional inaccuracy and warpage. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 137. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48545

HIKMAT M, ROSTAM S, & AHMED Y M Investigation of tensile property-based Taguchi method of PLA parts fabricated by FDM 3D printing technology. Results in Engineering, 2021, 11: 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100264

CHOHAN J S, KUMAR R, SINGH T B, et al. Taguchi S/N and TOPSIS Based Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling and Vapor Finishing Process for Manufacturing of ABS Plastic Parts. Materials (Basel), 2020: 13(22): 5176 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225176

BAICH L, MANOGHARAN G, & MARIE H. Study of infill print design on production cost-time of 3D printed ABS parts. International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing, 2015, 5: 308-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2015.074809

PEI E, LANZOTTI A, GRASSO M, et al. The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2015, 21: 604-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135

DEY A, HOFFMAN D, & YODO N. Optimizing multiple process parameters in fused deposition modeling with particle swarm optimization. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 2020, 14: 393-405 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12008-019-00637-9.

HEIDARI-RARANI M, EZATI N, SADEGHI P, & BADROSSAMAY M R. Optimization of FDM process parameters for tensile properties of polylactic acid specimens using Taguchi design of experiment method. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. (2020) https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705720964560.

DUDESCU C, & RACZ L. Effects of Raster Orientation, Infill Rate and Infill Pattern on the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Materials. Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis. Technical Series, 2017, 69, (1): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1515/aucts-2017-0004

CHO E E, HEIN H H, LYNN Z, et al. Investigation on Influence of Infill Pattern and Layer Thickness on Mechanical Strength of PLA Material in 3D Printing Technology. Journal of Engineering and Science Research, 2019, 3(2): 27-37. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.jesr.2019.2.5

CHACÓN J M, CAMINERO M A, GARCÍA-PLAZA E, & NÚNEZ P J. Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Materials & Design, 2017, 124: 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065

LI H, WANG T, SUN J, & YU Z. The effect of process parameters in fused deposition modelling on bonding degree and mechanical properties. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2018, 24(1): 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2016-0090


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.