Development of Inquiry-Based Social Science Digital Book to Improve Critical Thinking of Vocational School
Abstract
This study describes the need to develop and take steps to build Inquiry-Based Social Science Digital Books to improve vocational high school students’ critical thinking. This type of research is a case study approach whose data sources are data from class X Vocational High School Students and History Teachers. The data collection methods used observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis used the interactive flow analysis technique, which consisted of data reduction, display, and verification. Based on the results of field observations, the study results showed that student learning outcomes through Distance Learning (PJJ) History during the COVID-19 pandemic were still low. Based on the initial comments in six vocational schools in Sukoharjo Regency, it was found that social studies teachers had difficulties delivering history social studies material to students. As a result, students have difficulty in understanding the subject matter, impacting low learning outcomes. From the interviews conducted, information was obtained that teachers were less skilled at integrating social studies learning using digital book teaching media. Hence, developing an inquiry-based historical, and social studies digital book is still necessary to improve students’ critical thinking.
Keywords: critical thinking, digital book media development, vocational school.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
MIFTAH M. Fungsi, Dan Peran Media Pembelajaran Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Kwangsan, 2013, 1(2): 95-105.
ISTIQLAL A. Manfaat Media Pembelajaran Dalam Proses. Jurnal Kepemimpinan dan Pengurusan Sekolah, 2018, 3(2): 139–144.
WIBISONO S. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Solusi Sistem Informasi Terintegrasi. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK, 2005, X(3): 150–159.
SUSANTO A. Implementasi Sistem ERP (Enterprise Resources Planning) PT Pos Indonesia: Sebuah Inisiasi dan Strategi. Jurnal Penelitian Pos dan Informatika, 2013: 165–183.
ABSOR N F, UMASIH, and KURNIAWATI Pembelajaran Sejarah di SMK era revolusi industri 4.0: tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Teori dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, 2019, 4(2): 59-65, doi: 10.17977/um022v4i22019p059.
ANUGRAHANA A. Hambatan, Solusi dan Harapan: Pembelajaran Daring Selama Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Oleh Guru Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2020, 10(3): 282–289, doi: 10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i3.p282-289.
MAHARANI P, ALQODRI F, and CAHYA R A D. Pemanfaatan Software Sigil Sebagai Media Pembelajaran E-Learning Yang Mudah, Murah dan User Friendly dengan Format Epub sebagai Sumber Materi. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia, 2015, 6(8): 25-30.
HANI W F, INDRAWATI, and SUBIKI. Pengaruh Model Inquiry Training Disertai Media Audiovisual terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Retensi Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA (Fisika) DI Mts. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 2016, 4(4): 315-320.
NGWIRA G, and BANDA A. Levels of Inquiry Focused in the Examination Council of Zambia (ECZ). School Certificate Chemistry Paper 3 (5070/3) Examination. African Journal of Chemical Education, 2021, 11(1): 108-120.
KHALAF B K, and ZIN Z B M. Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 2018, 11(4): 545–564, doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.11434a.
KASMAIENEZHADFARD S, TALEBLOO B, ROUSTAE R, and POURRAJAB M. Students’ Learning Through Teaching Creativity: Teachers’ Perception. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 2015, 4(1): 1–13.
NUNAKI J H, DAMOPOLII I, NUSANTARI E, and KANDOWANGKO N Y. The contribution of metacognitive in the inquiry-based learning to students’ thinking skill based on SOLO Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, 1321(3): 032044, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032044.
SARWI. Implementation of Ethnoscience-based Guided Inquiry Learning on The Scientific Literacy and The Character of Elementary School Students. Journal of Primary Education, 2020, 9(2): 139-147.
MONTUORI A. Beyond postnormal times: The future of creativity and the creativity of the future. Futures, 2011, 43(2): 221-227, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.10.013.
NAIK D. Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas, 2017, 3(2): 568-571.
FACIONE P A. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction Executive Summary “The Delphi Report”. California Academy Press, 1990, 423(c): 1-19, [Online]. Available: http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/DEXadobe.PDF
FACIONE P A. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF
LESTARI D A B, ASTUTI B, and DARSONO T. Implementasi LKS Dengan Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2018, 4(2): 202-207, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v4i2.809.
BORG W R, & GALL M D. Educational research: an introduction. New York: Longman, 1983.
SEELS B B, & RICHEY R C. Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1994
RICHEY R C. and NELSON W A. Developmental Research. Safflower, 1996: 142–184, doi: 10.1201/9781439832080.ch6.
SUKMADINATA and SYAODIH N. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2008.
ARIKUNTO S. Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
SUKMADINATA and SYAODIH N. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2010.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
