Use of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Alternative Complementary Therapy Research
Abstract
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) continues to increase globally in treating various diseases. However, the potential role of CAM in modern clinical practice and health care systems appears to be limited and often even questioned. This limitation is caused by a demand to evaluate the success of CAM with a biomedical approach measure. The biomedical discipline uses scientific objectivity to explain medical phenomena through evidence-based methods, and the same method is often not applicable to CAM phenomena. This article proposes a qualitative research method with an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach that is more suitable to assess the success of CAM with a focus on the healing or life experience of participants. The use of qualitative research methods with an IPA approach provides a powerful tool for addressing doubts about the efficacy of CAM. Evidence of efficacy obtained from the healing experience of patients captured by the IPA method can be defiance of the hegemony of conventional biomedical evidence construction. The use of IPA in research on CAM therapy provides a different perspective from the quantitative approach to viewing a person’s health condition from the patient’s point of view. This different perspective will help researchers or health practitioners to provide assistance and or therapy that is more appropriate to the patient’s mental and physical condition.
Keywords: complementary and alternative medicine, interpretative phenomenological analysis, healing experience.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014-2023. WHO, Geneva, 2013: 1–78.
SIROIS, F. M., SALAMONSEN, A., and KRISTOFFERSEN, A. E. Reasons for continuing use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in students : a consumer commitment model. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 2016, 16(75): 1–9.
GUILLAUD, A. ALLENET, B. and PINSAULT, N. Does dissatisfaction with physicians lead patients to alternative practitioners? Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2020, 39, article id: 101109.
EUROCAM. CAM 2020: The contribution of Complementary and Alternative Medicine to sustainable healthcare in Europe. 2014.
KRAMLICH, D. Introduction to complementary, alternative, and traditional therapies. Critical Care Nurse, 2014, 34(6): 50–56; quiz 57.
BARRY, C. A. The role of evidence in alternative medicine: Contrasting biomedical and anthropological approaches. Social Science & Medicine, 2006, 62(11): 2646–2657.
ACCAD, M. and FRANCIS, D. Does evidence based medicine adversely affect clinical judgment? BMJ, 2018, 362, article id: k2799,.
SCOTT, J. G., WARBER, S. L., DIEPPE, P., JONES, D. and STANGE, K. C. Healing journey: A qualitative analysis of the healing experiences of Americans suffering from trauma and illness. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(e016771): 1–8.
VERHOEF, M. J. and MULKINS, A. The healing experience - How can we capture it? Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing, 2012, 8(4): 231–236.
GRUNDSTRÖM, H., ALEHAGEN, S., KJØLHEDE, P., & BERTERÖ, C. The double-edged experience of healthcare encounters among women with endometriosis: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2018, 27(1-2): 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13872
JOHNSTON, S.A., KRASUSKA, M., MILLINGS, A., et al. Experiences of rosacea and its treatment: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Dermatology, 2018, 178(1): 154–160,.
MCGEECHAN, G. J., MCPHERSON, K. E. and ROBERTS, K. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of living with colorectal cancer as a chronic illness. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2018, 27(15–16): 3148–3156.
HOWARD, K., KATSOS, N., and GIBSON, J. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in autism research. Autism, 2019, 23(7): 1871–1876.
ALMEGEWLY, W., GOULD, D., and ANSTEY, S. Hidden voices: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of surviving breast cancer in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Research in Nursing, 2019, 24(1–2): 122–132.
PEAT, G., RODRIGUEZ, A., and SMITH, J. Interpretative phenomenological analysis applied to healthcare research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 2019, 22(1): 7–9.
TANG, K. H. and DOS SANTOS, L. M. A Brief Discussion and Application of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in the Field of Health Science and Public Health. International Journal of Learning and Development, 2017, 7(3): 123-132.
SMITH, S., EATOUGH, V., SMITH, J., et al. ‘I know I’m not invincible’: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of thyroid cancer in young people. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2018, 23(2): 352–370.
MILLER, R. M., CHAN, C. D., and FARMER, L. B. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: A Contemporary Qualitative Approach. Counselor Education and Supervision, 2018, 57(4): 240–254.
ALASE, A. The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2017, 5(2): 9–19.
JEONG, H. and OTHMAN, J. Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis from a Realist Perspective. Qualitative Report, 2016, 21(3): 558–570.
LAVERTY, S. M. Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2017, 2(3): 21–35.
RODRIGUEZ, A. and SMITH, J. Phenomenology as a healthcare research method. Evidence-Based Nursing, 2018, 21(4): 96–98.
SMITH, J. A. Participants and researchers searching for meaning: Conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2019, 16( 2): 166–181.
CHARLICK, S., PINCOMBE, J., MCKELLAR, L., and FIELDER, A. Making sense of participant experiences: interpretative phenomenological analysis in midwifery research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2016, 11: 205–216.
PIETKIEWICZ, I., and SMITH, J. A. A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne (Psychological Journal), 2012, 18(2): 361–369.
LARKIN, M., SHAW, R., and FLOWERS, P. Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2019, 16(2): 182–198.
SMITH, J. A. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Getting at lived experience. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2017, 12(3): 303–304.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
