Main Gaps in Ecological Corridors Identification, Management, and Preservation in Danube-Carpathian Region

Rebeka Petrtylova, Milan Husar, Matej Jasso, Maros Finka, Vladimir Ondrejicka, Junxiang Li, Krisztina Filepne Kovacs, Istvan Valanszki, Laszlo Kollanyi


The Danube-Carpathian region represents one of the most preserved natural habitats for wildlife species in Europe. It is the last European great wilderness area, a stronghold for large carnivores, and home to the large remaining reserves of old-growth forests. Achieving ecological connectivity of the area is an inevitable part of its protection. Therefore, ecological corridors, which play a wide range of roles such as protecting endangered species and the biodiversity of territory, and securing its eco-connectivity while facilitating various ecosystem services, need to be thoroughly identified, managed and protected. That can contribute to avoiding landscape fragmentation and preserving the environment, including the endangered animal species. However, a comprehensive and coordinated ecological corridor identification, management, and preservation system within this region are missing, and the concerned countries meet with diverse problems when dealing with the issue. That creates one of the key problems in protecting these valuable natural areas. In order to identify the main gaps in the planning processes and tools related to the ecological corridors, broad analytical work has been undertaken supported by the questionnaire, carried out in the concerned 5 countries located in the Danube-Carpathian region. The paper's objective is to identify the gaps in the identification, management, and preservation of ecological corridors' involvement of the public in the processes such as integration of ecological networks into spatial planning in legal processes. The outcome of the study thus contributes to establishing an integrated approach for strengthening the capacity for identifying, managing, and protecting ecological corridors and helps to overcome the conflict between infrastructure development and wildlife conservation. The paper's novelty lies in the scope and breadth of the analysis, covering 5 Carpathian countries and stakeholders from various sectors under the umbrella of EU funded Interreg DTP Project.


Keywords: ecological corridors, Danube-Carpathian region, ecological connectivity, management.


Full Text:



FINKA M., HUSAR M., ONDREJICKA V., and JAMECNY L. The wildlife aspect in the linear transport infrastructure development processes. Institute of Physics Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 603(2): 022004.


INTERREG-DANUBE. Summary on Best Practices: Addressing Ecological Connectivity and Spatial Development, 2021.

FERRETTI V., & POMARICO S. An integrated approach for studying the land suitability for ecological corridors through spatial multicriteria evaluations. Environment Development and Sustainability, 2013, 15: 859–885.

GUNDUZ S., GULER G., and YILDIZCI A. C. Ecological corridors and clusters for environmental master plan and environmental management studies of Istanbul. A|Z Istanbul Technical University Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 2011, 8(1): 229-240.

PENG J., ZHAO H., and LIU Y. Urban ecological corridors construction: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(1): 23-30.

TURZOVA M., GAZOVA D., and HUSAR M. Harmonization of Conflicts in Contact Zones Between Dense Urban Landscape and Protected Natural Areas; Case Study Devinska Kobyla (Bratislava, Slovakia). Institute of Physics Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 960: 022057.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. European Spatial Development Perspective — Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1999.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Territorial Agenda of the European Union - Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, 2020.

JASSO M., & FINKA M. The Role of Leadership in the Current Contexts of Central European Planning Culture. 2019. In: JASSO M., FINKA M., and HUSAR M. (Eds.). The Role of Public Sector in Local Economic and Territorial Development. Springer, Cham, 2019.

SIMEONOVA V., BOS E., JONGMAN R., and ZINGSTRA H. Implementation of Ecological Networks in Different Socio-Economic Contexts. Alterra, Wageningen, 2009.

XU H., PLIENINGER T., and PRIMDAHL J. A Systematic Comparison of Cultural and Ecological Landscape Corridors in Europe. Land, 2019, 8(3): 41

MAZZORANA B., NARDINI A., COMITI F., VIGNOLI G., COOK E., ULLOA H., and IROUMÉ A. Toward participatory decision-making in river corridor management: two case studies from the European Alps. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2017, 61(7): 1250-1270.

INTERREG-DANUBE. ConnectGREEN: Restoring and managing ecological corridors in mountains as the green infrastructure in the Danube basin, 2022.



  • There are currently no refbacks.